Article

MAYOR’s SUSPICIOUS, CLOSED, SECRET ACTIONS RE: ‘100GATE’ CONTINUE … CLAIRMONT BLIND-SIDED … LEASE WILL BE SIGNED ON WEDNESDAY, WITH COUNCIL AND CITIZENS SHUT OUT OF THE PROCESS

0 0 votes
Article Rating

By DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI News and Commentary

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, MONDAY, SEPT. 22, 2014) — Tomorrow night, if the center continues to fall apart, our Right Honorable Good Friends on the Pittsfield City Council shall face a tipping point. After this vote, citizens will know where councilors stand: Are they for We The People and for open government or do they favor the mayor and his closed, democracy-trashing administration?

This story developed on social media. Over the weekend, councilor-at-large Barry Clairmont posted the following:

I just looked at the agenda for the next council meeting. The Mayor is going to answer the list of questions I put forward regarding the move of 40% of City Hall workers to 100 North Street. I was kind enough to agree that he could delay the answers from the September 2nd meeting (at his request) until the first meeting in October (as I’m on vacation and will miss the meeting next Tuesday). President Mazzeo assured me the answer session wouldn’t take place while I was on vacation. Well, so much for promises. She put it on the agenda for Tuesday night. How fair is that? I believe transparency was the theme the Mayor ran on.

Tabling Will Happen; Will Councilors Support It Or Will They Back Closed Government? 

Clairmont raises a serious charge which brings up many lines of discussion. Before that, let’s share some additional news on this disturbing development. THE PLANET has learned that:

* The mayor intends to sign the lease for 100 North St. on Wednesday of this week, the day after the council meeting.

* Council president Melissa Mazzeo asked the mayor not to sign the lease, arguing that Bianchi owes the council — and more importantly, citizens — a full explanation on “100gate.” The mayor refused this request.

* Clairmont’s petition is on the Oct. 14 agenda. Bianchi supposedly will answer Clairmont’s questions then. Of course, the ink on the lease will have been three weeks dry. It will be like Amos McCoy telling Luke to close the stable door after Mr. Ed has wandered off on Wilbur Post, to mix old TV sitcom metaphors. Heckuva lot of good it will do.

* A motion will be made to table agenda item 11. The ensuing vote shallmeasure where individual councilors stand on “100gate” and its many alarming aspects. A vote to table shall be a vote to stand with citizens, taxpayers, and the public. It shall also be a repudiation of the moldy, damp, dark, and claustrophobic style of “leadership” redolently emanating from the corner office. A vote not to table shall identify the mayoral water carriers and rubber stamps.

A Couple of Points are in Order:

1. Fair Play — Clairmont’s questions regarding “100gate” were scheduled to be answered on Sept. 2. The mayor requested a delay to October, because city solicitor Kathy Degan was not available on Sept. 2. THE PLANET asks why the mayor was incapable of answering Clairmont’s questions with legal advice? Was he worried about illegalities? In the spirit of collegiality, Clairmont deferred to the mayor. Now, the at-large councilor says, the council president broke a promise and gave in to the mayor to have the matter dealt with while Clairmont was unavailable.

2. Into the Darkness, Blindly — Once again, citizens and taxpayers — with nearly a $500,000 on the line — Mayor Dan Bianchi has kept you out of the loop. This continues an almost unbroken display of mayoral arrogance against Mary Jane and Joe Kapanski, the proverbial Little Guys as well as a contempt for the democratic process, openness, transparency, and sound fiduciary policy.

What Can You Do About It?

The lease won’t be signed until Wednesday. This gives you one last shot to make your voice heard. What can you do?

SHOW UP.

Attend the council meeting on Tuesday and bring a bunch of friends. Sign up to speak during the open mic session that begins the meeting. In politics, there is strength in numbers. Citizens can send a loud message by making it know they have a voice today and in the 2015 mayoral elections.

To give you a taste of the online debate Clairmont started, here is a string of comments with respect to Clairmont’s Facebook posting:

  • Tom Sakshaug I think the agenda is quite transparent. It is,”screw you!”
    23 hrs · Unlike · 4
  • James Wilusz That’s really too bad and unfortunate but not surprised.
  • Mary’s Carrot Cake One big nightmare. Thanks for caring. Very upsetting to see the lack of collaboration, mistrust, and blatant deceit. Poor Pittsfield. Time for new leadership. Honesty is all we ask. Not getting it. Sorry Barry.
  • Jeff Barcus can a citizen go and make a request to table? Seem that roberts rules (or whatever the council uses for guidance) should allow that an author that is not available be accorded that courtesy.
  • James Wilusz I would like to see the city council, (you know, the one’s we vote for) step up and table this.
  • Dan Valenti This SHOULD NOT take place without you, BC. We The People must do more than be “sorry, Barry.” WEP must make their voices heard and not allow this tactic. That would assume a lot, I realize, for example, that people — citizens and taxpayers — not only realize that THEY own the government but that they act as the owners. Tabling until Oct. 7 is the only honorable thing to do. Surely, the council president knows this. Surely, council members will realize this and act accordingly.
  • Mary Lou Mosca Robinson This is unacceptable and shows disrespect for you Barry and the entire council members as well! Melissa Mazzeo should step up to the plate and honor the promise she made to you and postpone this issue to the next meeting.
  • Mary’s Carrot Cake It’s been hard to work around dictatorship. Democracy is a constant battle to maintain amid what we are watching.
  • Barry Clairmont Jeff, I hope this does get tabled. Please, make your voice heard at the open mic period at the beginning of the meeting. If people don’t speak up, the other councilors will think you don’t care.
  • Jeff Barcus OK I’ll be there….sweating bullets—-I so dislike public speaking but this is important on principal.
  • Mary Lou Mosca Robinson I urge everyone to attend the meeting.and speak at the open mic period stating our dismay and outrage
  • Mary Lou Mosca Robinson This is a total slap in the face to all of the residence in our city! This behavior must stop!
  • Kathy Lloyd Holy moly! Really??
  • Dan Valenti People, listen up. Time to get a social network going. One tell two. Two tell four. Four tell eight. The message: contact the city council president, your individual councilor, and as many councilors at large as you can/ That tactic brought down Mubarik in Egypt. It can get a get a friggin motion table in Podunk. Rise up!! Also show up. Be there Tuesday. Let your voice be heard from the open mic. Make your preference known with your PRESENCE. Intimidate them. Show them who’s boss. This could be a great moment for the city, you know.
  • Mary Lou Mosca Robinson I would hope that those on the city council will speak up and support Councilor Clairmont on this..speak up and voice your dismay. This can not continue!
  • Jeff Barcus any body know the protocol? do you just show up? or do you have to sort of “sign in” in advance?
  • Tom Sakshaug Jeff, you get there before 7 pm and put your name on the sheet at the podium. You get about 3 minutes to speak. I wish I could be there but I will be out of town.
  • Denis Guyer And here I thought I was going to be able to just simply enjoy my “retirement” …..quietly.
  • Tom Sakshaug Have at it, Denis! You too Jeff. And Mary. And Dan. And anyone else. Demand tabling.
  • Tom Sakshaug If I ask you a question and you CHOOSE to answer it when I am not present, it says a great deal about your integrity.
  • Tom Sakshaug I suppose I could repeat my previous comment. Integrity, courage, plain courtesy.
  • Tom Sakshaug A motion to table this item will be made. The vote will separate the wheat from the chaff, the lackeys from the independent thinkers, the fair minded from the robots.
  • Tom Sakshaug It’s right there in black and white: ” 11. A communication from Mayor Bianchi stating that he will be making a presentation regarding the Inspectional Services Department’s move to 100 North St.” Am I reading it wrong?
  • Kathy Lloyd If Councilor Mazzeo thinks this is a misstatement from Councilor Clairmont, I’d love to hear the other side. This looks pretty bad from BC’s statement.
  • Denis Guyer Maybe putting it on an agenda when BC is out if town is nothing more than a petty power move…..another tit for tat that has now become quite normal in Pittsfield. OR it could also be taken that the Mayor and his council allies are doing it this way so that BC is not present to ask any probing questions about the deal.
  • Kathy Lloyd So I just had a 25 minute conversation with Melissa Mazzeo. She says that Barry’s petition is not in fact on the agenda Tuesday night, that the Mayor is coming to answer questions from the other city councilors because he is signing the lease the very next day. She asked the Mayor to put off the lease signing but he will not and she therefore felt that the rest of the council (and the public) deserved an explanation from the Mayor on his decision to sign the lease before he signs it. Barry’s petition is still on the agenda for the 14th of October and the Mayor will answer his questions specifically then. The council and we have no power to stop the signing of the lease and no real say in the matter, which I find frustrating.
  • Tom Sakshaug This whole lease thing has been anything but transparent.
  • Kathy Lloyd spending this amount of money without a large and loud public conversation is reprehensible.
    ——– 000 ——–

This gives you an idea of the tone and tenor of the debate, an important one that goes beyond the immediate issue at hand. At stake is nothing less than ownership of the government. Ladies and Gentlemen, the ball is in your court. Stand up. Be heard. Be counted. Demand accountability.

————————————————————————————-

“And Wendy’s stealing clothes from Marks and Sparks, and Freddy’s got spots from ripping off the stars from his face. Funky little boat race. Television man is crazy, saying we’re juvenile delinquent wrecks. Oh man, I need TV when I got T. Rex. I’m a dude, dad.”Mott the Hoople, “All the Young Dudes,” (1973).

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
22 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
downtown dweller
downtown dweller
9 years ago

http://www.mass.gov/ethics/commission-services/complaints/file-a-complaint.html

Filing an official complaint is also an option.

Unfortunately I will still be at work during the open mic portion of the meeting. I’m hoping that a number of residents decide that they are “mad as hell and not going to take it anymore!”

The mayor continues to give the finger to the resident’s of Pittsfield.

Linda
Linda
9 years ago

The underhanded dirty dealing continues. To pull this on a city councilor after a promise has been made is terrible. I hope everyone shows up at the meeting tomorrow.

Spider
Spider
9 years ago

The mayor will pull “an Obama”….you know…I have the pen, I have the power…I can do it myself.

He will give his presentation……some on the council will ask pertinent questions and it probably will be tabled.

But guess what, folks? The very next day it will be SIGNED!

What then?

MrG1188
MrG1188
9 years ago

I am curious, does he have the right, either expressly or implied, to expend funds that do not have a budget line item? I mean that fact alone, that there is no way of knowing where the money came from, should give us all pause.

Taconic Slaves
Taconic Slaves
Reply to  MrG1188
9 years ago

Apparently he can do anything he damn well pleases. He is a dictator. He does not need the council’s approval to spend future funds. To hell with what the people want.

You and I were never supposed to any of this.

Heil Hitler!

Silence Dogood
Silence Dogood
9 years ago

Time for a recall election….let’s send this bird brain packing.

B
B
9 years ago

I just sent an email out to WasteWatchers@WNYT.com, asking them to look at this matter and put us on TV news as the major wastes our tax payers money. Please people do the same and tell them the story. I am not good at writing. Please tell WasteWatchers Pittsfield story. The more people who write them the better chance we have of being on TV channel 13 news. Dan you would be perfect at this because you could tell many stories that will bring the TV station to us.

PopKornSutton
PopKornSutton
9 years ago

Hate to say it but TEs doesn’t have to answer to Barold or anyone else.

Jonathan Melle
Jonathan Melle
9 years ago

It is interesting to me that the focus on democracy is on Pittsfield Mayor Dan Bianchi when the entire Berkshire delegation to Beacon Hill’s State House are all unopposed this year, along with the Berkshire D.A., along with the Springfield-based Congressman. It appears that there is apathy instead of democracy in Pittsfield politics!

tito
tito
9 years ago

Anybody got the Pittsfield High 1964 50th class reunion photos?

Donna Walto
Donna Walto
9 years ago

If all that I am reading is true I am feeling sad for our City. Democracy is important and if We the People are not a part of the democratic process of checks and balance than we are being short changed by our executive branch of government. In a book written by the historian Ray Rafael, he traced the beginnings of the Revolutionary War to the Patriots and Farmers of Pittsfield, in opposition to British Rule in August of 1774, so I find it interesting, that at this time in our history a city councilor’s petition is being addressed after the deal is done.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
Reply to  Donna Walto
9 years ago

What is the name of that book?

Mr. X
Mr. X
9 years ago

Scapin in 15!!

Kathy Lloyd
Kathy Lloyd
9 years ago

Correct me if I’m wrong here, but if Item 11 is tabled then no one has a chance to question the Mayor the day before he signs the lease. Why do we want to table the item? I want to hear what Bianchi has to say about this debacle.

I get that Barry has done all the footwork here, but I don’t want to miss the off chance that someone on the council can possibly change the course of the lease signing because Barry can’t be there to get his due.

B
B
Reply to  Kathy Lloyd
9 years ago

Good point Kathy.

What has to be said
What has to be said
Reply to  Kathy Lloyd
9 years ago

Yes Kathy, I agree.

I understand that Barry can’t make it. Why I guess is nobody’s business.

However, to miss such a crucial meeing where 1/2 a million dollars of tax payer money is at stake is puzzling. The councilors are elected and paid to be there. They know well in advance when the meetings take place. It would seem proper to arrange any other affairs around those scheduled meetings.

Maybe they can set up and a monitor and have Barry’s head beamed in and he can do a virtual attendance.

Bottom line is the mayor is going to sign the contract on Wed. Its been a done deal since its inception.

Take a look at Barry’s voting record and its clear he voted for every single budget this mayor has set before him. He is really not for any tax relief to the taxpayers at all.

He is right to question the mayor on this but the reality is, its not going to make any difference.

JB
JB
Reply to  What has to be said
9 years ago

According to Mr. Clairmont’s post and certainly not refuted by Council president Mazzeo’s response relayed in the middle of that thread somewhere, when the matter came up at the 9/2/14 meeting it was postponed until the first scheduled October meeting because Ms Degnan would be unavailable due to a family loss.

I’m not clear if the lease signing date was known at the time or not. Was it known or not? Make a HUGE difference in my mind.

Certainly a death in the family warrants every consideration for postponement, which happened.

If the signing date was public information —-or at least known to Councilor Clairmont and the rest of the council at the 9.2 meeting, then you may have a point.

Nota
Nota
9 years ago

I’m still bemused by the Pittsfield irport expansion? Who really did it benefit? heard the owner made close to eighty G on a quickie flight that some south county bird with cash on a one day trip…nice. if Barely can’t make, maybe L T can sub as his replacement. Bottom line is they all want a new spot, whom are they kidding?

Nota
Nota
9 years ago

Went to North Street today on business, will never use it again.

JB
JB
Reply to  Nota
9 years ago

north street? how will you get around town?

Tito
Tito
9 years ago

Fire Rex Ryan!

Nota
Nota
9 years ago

Mail it in!