Article

PLANET SQUEEZES SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEMBERS — BIANCHI, YON, ELIAS, RIELLO, FARRON, TAYLOR, & CUTLER — ABOUT COTE CONTRACT AND PHS BULLYING … plus … LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: BULLYING AND STATE LAW … QUESTIONS ABOUT BFAIR’S CLAIM FOR STONEHENGE SELECTION

0 0 votes
Article Rating

By DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI News and Commentary

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, MONDAY, MARCH 24, 2014) — As you likely know, THE PLANET has recently taken up two important items — not covered by any other local media, incidentally — dealing with the Pittsfield School Department. They are important for many reasons, not the least of which is that the schools make up more than 70% of the entire $135 million city budget, a fact that likely explains the reticence of the other media to cover this important story.

We have directly asked the Pittsfield School Committee about these two items: Frank Cote’s contract and a horrible case of alleged bullying at PHS, about which nothing seems to have been done. In short, on behalf of citizens,THE PLANET has called them out.

Cushy Contract for Cote at Its Conclusion

The first column dealt with the cushy contract of Frank Cote, “assistant superintendent for vocational, workforce, and college readiness programs.” That’s what we call a “two-breath title.” Nice to know the PSD isn’t top heavy with unproductive, administrative fluff.

Fortunately for bedraggled taxpayers, Cote’s contract expires on June 30, 2014. In other words, We The People can get out of this deal, foisted upon them by Cote’s best bud, former school superintendent Jake Eberwein III. Jake promoted Cote from vice president of PHS after his great work there, including the never-solved theft of $10,000 in prom money from an English teacher’s drawer. Neither Cote nor school principal Tracy Benson were in the building the day of the theft. As a result, the guardian of the money could not deposit the 10 Gs in the school safe. Cote also got the Free House going on Love Me Avenue for a woman who happened to be his secretary.

We asked each school committee member about Cote’s contract: Do they that contract should be allowed to expire or not?

What Did Committee Member Do About PHS Bullying Case?

THE PLANET’s second column discussed a case of bullying that reportedly took place at PHS in which a gang of at least five other girls tormented a 15-year-old girl. Despite the report that staff witnessed at least one of the incidents, nothing was done about it. If this report is true, THE PLANET wondered how it squared with the PSD’s lengthy, wordy anti-bullying policy.  We wanted the school committee members’ views.

We sent this message to Dan Bianchi, Kathy Yon, Dan Elias, Pam Farron, Tony Riello, Cindy Taylor, and Josh Cutler.

——- 000 ——-

HELLO ALL
In recent days, my website — PLANETVALENTI.com — has covered two issues related to the school department. The first deals with a horrible case of alleged bullying at PHS, which was reportedly witnessed by teachers and staff, reported to the administration, with nothing done to punish the perpetrators. That story ran on March 19. The second deals with the current employment contract of asst. superintendent for vocational, Frank Cote. That ran on March 6 with a follow-up on March 21. If you haven’t read those stories, I would invite you to do so, because of I a few questions:

(1) Have you looked into the case of alleged bullying? If so, what did you do and would you share that with me. If not, why not? And if not, would you do so and keep us informed?

(2) Can you give us a comment on that particular case and of other such stories we have all heard (can it only be me?) about rampant bullying with little or nothing done to punish the perpetrators.

(3) Regarding Mr. Cote’s three-year contract, it expires on June 1. I would like to know (a) How do you intend to vote on the renewal of his contract. If you think he should be rehired, would you please tell us why? If not, same thing.

Thanks. Feel free to add any other comments. I shall be posting your responses (or non-responses) on THE PLANET. A non-respose will be taken as your response. I would only add that I trust you realize that your constituents, who are citywide, deserve to know where you all stand.

Best,
DAN

——- 000 ——-

THE PLANET shall share our findings in the stridently near future. As of press time, we have heard from Dan Elias. Period. The remainder have until the end of the week.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Let’s now share a couple of letters.

Anti-Bullying Policy is ‘a Matter of State Law’

To The Planet:

It may be helpful to your article today about bullying to note the following…

Anti bullying in schools is a matter of the law and not just a policy in a schools’ handbook. 

Chapter 70 section 36 is quite clear on the procedures for bullying in schools. See links below.   

Note in the second link the requirement of school depts to report anti bullying data to the MA Dept of elementary and secondary schools  (DESE). 

Thus your article highlights a violation of the law by PPS and not just is own handbook. 

Hope this helps — Mighty Puca

—– 00 —–

Response to BFAR on Selection of #71 Stonehenge for Group Home

To The Planet:

I read with interest your article on the meeting of the Stonehenge Rd neighbors with BFAIR. I find the response from BFAIR as to why it chose 71 Stonehenge odd. 
 
Why #71? — BFAIR says it chose 71 Stonehenge because of the size, four bedrooms; that is has a level lot, and that is is a single-level home. BFAIR has claimed that there were only two homes on the market in Pittsfield that met these criteria: 71 Stonehenge and a home on West Street. It apparently rejected the West Street home because the condition wasn’t as good as the home on Stonehenge.

Only 2 homes on the market that met the criteria? Really? The Pittsfield R/E market is glutted with inventory now as it was last year. As of this morning there were 145 4 B/R homes for sale in Pittsfield listed on Zillow. 

 
BFAIR says they were looking for a 4 B/R home. Odd, in that 71 Stonehenge is a 3 B/R home. The listing on Zillow still shows this. How did the home fall under their radar when it didn’t have 4 BRs?

 
As to BFAIR’s claim about the condition of 71 Stonehenge; it is not bad but nothing special. I was at the open house for 71 Stonehenge when it first went on the market so I got to see the inside. One wonders why they need to put 250K in renovations into a home costing 350K if the condition is so great.
It’s political intrigue and secret dealings all the way down in old Pittsfield. — The Insider
—– 00 —–

THE PLANET thanks our letter writers. We encourage letters on all issues and points of view.

———————————————————————————

“ATLANTIS ROSE drums wreathe the rose, / the star floats burning in a gulf of tears / and sleep another thousand [years]. — Hart Crane, “Indiana.”

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
33 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dusty
dusty
10 years ago

I am picturing several school committee members on a conference call with each other, fretting about the Dan Valenti letter. “How do we handle this? I think if we just, as a group, ignore it, it will go away. Now stick together on this.”

Mr Elias is probably in the doghouse.

B
B
Reply to  dusty
10 years ago

Wouldn’t that violate the open meeting laws?

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
Reply to  B
10 years ago

I was thinking the same thing,I’m sure secret/illegal meeting happen all the time in Pittsfield.

teecha teecha
teecha teecha
Reply to  dusty
10 years ago

Mr. Elias is a breath of fresh air. I had him as a coach at CYC and wasn’t too impressed, but I must say he is one of the few on this board that I trust if not to handle situations, but to attempt to.

MrG1188
MrG1188
10 years ago

Sorry Dusty, that would be a clear violation of Open Meeting laws and we know the SC would NEVER do that!

Spider
Spider
10 years ago

The city’s Ordinance Review Committee is on hold according to a story in today’s BB. City Clerk Linda Tyer, the chairwoman wants to hire a consulting firm (as Northampton did) to advise the committee. HOWEVER, city solicitor Degnan feels it is not necessary because “she could advise the group” and our mayor agrees.

I don’t know about the rest of you…..but I have more confidence in our City Clerk than I do in Degnan.

Scott
Scott
Reply to  Spider
10 years ago

Hey then the mayor can add saving us money on consulting to his long list of “accomplishments”.

C.J.
C.J.
10 years ago

If Mr. Cote’s services are so valuable that the school system has to execute an exclusive contract with him to assure that he doesn’t take advantage of what must be numerous other organizations pining for him and competing for his employment, then in all fairness to him, don’t renew his contract, but let him test the open market as a free agent. Why stymie the earning power of such a high demand skilled individual ?
Same with all exclusively contracted municipal employees.Don’t hold them back, let the job market prevail.

Scott
Scott
10 years ago

Nice CJ it’ll never happen but nice to dream about. They’ll continue to milk us until they make the city bankrupt.

Mad Trapper
Mad Trapper
10 years ago

Why is the OVERPAID SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION, NOT held acountable?

Tell us Dan?

Mad Trapper
Mad Trapper
10 years ago

Why is the OVERPAID SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION, NOT held acountable?

Tell us Dan?

Scott
Scott
Reply to  Mad Trapper
10 years ago

Because the majority of people who vote keep these people in power. Now top companies in Ma are saying they can’t find employees with enough brains to do tech jobs coming out of the public school system. This will either serve as a wake up call or be used as a tool to continue bloating the school budgets and top admin jobs all across mass. Yay!

Rafael
Rafael
Reply to  Scott
10 years ago

It will be used as a tool to continue bloating the school budget. And alot of it is pure BS. That is what companies are saying, but the truth is they are making up an excuse for hiring tech workers from other countries (aka off-shoring) because they work cheap, real cheap. I’ve seen my own company do it over and over again. And these foreign workers are not nearly as good as American workers.
And since when is HS where specific tech skills are taught – that is what college is for. We only hire those with college education or equivalent experience – we never hire anyone out of HS not matter their skills. Again, it’s all BS used as an excuse to gorge the taxpayer.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
10 years ago

I believe a forensic audit of the school departments books is long overdue. I bet some very troubling things would be discovered. We are taxed to death here and I think a 1% cut in all city department budgets would be a good start.

dusty
dusty
Reply to  Joe Blow
10 years ago

I agree. Who would be a good person to talk to about the viability of such a thing? How much would it cost and how soon can it be done. If not, why not?

If not, why not mayor?

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
Reply to  dusty
10 years ago

I’m not sure but maybe some sort of citizens petition? I think more people including myself need to attend the city council meetings and start raising hell.

Ron Kitterman
Ron Kitterman
10 years ago

I agree with double vision teecha teecha about Dan Elias no wonder why he’s a top vote getter, he has a lot of integrity, hopefully the rest of the committee will follow his leadership and bring a plate to the table so we can see what they are made of.

Magic
Magic
10 years ago

Joe B I agree 1% pay cut to all city employees would make me happy. I have a decent job and haven’t had a raise in 4 years I know a 1% all the way around cut for these people they would still be making more than I am.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
Reply to  Magic
10 years ago

Not just for city employees but the whole city budget and this should continue for at least the next 5 years. It’s time for some serious belt-tightening, enough is enough! Like you said good luck getting a raise,pension or cadillac benefits packages in the dreaded private sector. The working man is getting squeezed from every direction. The public employee unions need to come to grips with reality. If they can’t ,then it’s time to bust them up. I’m all for people to make a living wage but we just can’t afford this anymore.

B
B
Reply to  Magic
10 years ago

The City Hall workers have not had a raise in several years, I don’t think they deserve a 1% cut. Force the school committee to decrease administrators by 25% whether it is either 25% of them have to leave or all take the 25% decrease in pay. Our Counselman need to take a stand on this, if you don’t give them the money they can’t spend it. Oh I forgot most of our councilmen are cookie-cutter baked and put on a platter for the mayor to gobble up. If the mayor says jump they say how high.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
Reply to  B
10 years ago

I’m not saying we cut peoples pay. I’m saying each and every department find 1% of their overall budget that is not necessary. There seems to be a attitude of it’s better to spend it all than give back what is left over.

ShirleyKnutz
ShirleyKnutz
10 years ago

We will help Pittsfield “Be Creative” in how they can save money AND build a new voc building for the kids…build it behind PHS. All the students would then be in one school. If they need extra rooms they could put the seniors in Mercer…no one is ever there anyways.

B
B
Reply to  ShirleyKnutz
10 years ago

One solution is double sessions just like I had when I was in 10th grade at PHS.

amandaWell
amandaWell
10 years ago

Dan Elias is above reproach, a common soul and a Class Act. he is committed to the youth in this city and in sports activities, has been for years.

Terry Kinnas
Terry Kinnas
10 years ago

Dan, I called the Superintendent about two weeks ago on the same situation related to the bullying problem. On the following Monday, I gave the superintendent the name of the face book poster. Please note I was called with the posting info on Facebook; I do not use or reference Facebook.

I want to thank Dan Elias for responding. All members of the school committee should respond to all the questions.

dusty
dusty
Reply to  danvalenti
10 years ago

Thank you for showing responsibility Josh. The city needs school committee members who truly care about the children and are not just part of the money sucking machine.