Article

“VOTE FOR THE VOTE” PT. 3 — A MYSTERY WITH A WHIFF OF SCANDAL

0 0 votes
Article Rating

By DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI News and Commentary

Third of Three Parts

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, WEDNESDAY, FEB. 4, 2015) — Soon, unless there is a change in plans, there will be an announcement of a petition drive to put a direct vote on the Taconic High School construction project — up or down — on the ballot. To be successful, this will need the involvement of thousands of citizens.

Speaking of that, it’s funny how THE PLANET‘s relentless airing of this issue has forced The Establishment to take some notice. Singlehandedly, at this site and on television, we drove so much heat toward this story that The Boring Broadsheet had to take notice. Yesterday, they featured a pg. 1 story above the fold on the possibility of a referendum. We didn’t read the story, just glanced at headlines. We doubt The BB gave credit to THE PLANET for again acting as its news director. Elsewhere when you steal other people’s ideas they call it plagiarism. In Pittsfield, it passes for journalism. Pretty close though, since both are “ism”s.

Elsewhere around the city, in bars and restaurants, clubs and socials, street corners and water coolers, the mood is building and the message is clear: Politicians, do your job. Put the school issue on the ballot. Our Right Honorable Good Friends on the city council, of course, could do just that with passage of a simple resolution to do just that. Such an action would be the most direct and sure way to get this done. If the council were to do this, it would immediately rectify so many years of ignoring citizens and getting away with it because politics has soooo turned off the casual voter. Apathy has set in, leaving elections in the hands of the Special Interests. This would be a chance to change all that.

Malcolm Butler proves that miracles can happen. We ask you: Is it more easier for an undrafted rookie free agent few have ever heard of to single-handedly win a Super Bowl than it is for the city council to do the right thing and put the THS school construction issue on the ballot?

Don’t hold your breath. Still, miracles can happen. Ask Malcom Butler of the Super Bowl Champs The New England Patriots.

——– 000 ——–

Tactically, this is a story about the allocation of hundreds of millions of dollars the city can’t afford for a new school it doesn’t need. Philosophically, it boils down to the fate of representative government in the city. If there is no popular vote on this issue, it will ultimately be the fault of We The People for not forcing The Suits to do their bidding.

THE PLANET knows full too well how you have been disgusted with the performance of local government these past 30 years. Your disgust is justified. Your apathy, however, isn’t.

If this petition effort gets under way, it will be about much more than the specific issue of building or not building a new high school. The petition initiative will address an opportunity for citizens and taxpayers to reclaim the government that they own. The Suits have snatched the deed from Mary Jane and Joe Kapanski, but an initiative drive presents a pragmatic chance to win the deed back. For if the petition drive gets under way and is successful in getting a vote on the $150 million THS project on the ballot, it send a warning shot across the bow for the 2015 general election.

By forcing a vote on this issue, taxpayers and citizens will put every candidate for office in September and November of this year on notice. They had better do our bidding, or else. Or else what? Or else they will be summarily executed.

A Faulty Major Premise

Throughout this entire odyssey, the mayor’s office, the SBNC, the school committee, and the city council have not presented enough data to support the contention to justify the claim that the city needs to build this new facility. From the get-go, the project has proceeded deductively based on an a priori major premise that “Pittsfield needs to build a new THS.” Yeah? Says who? Certainly not the citizens.

The approach should have been an inductive one. The evidence first should have been accumulated, shared, and evaluated. Only then could the conclusion be true.

That major premise (“Pittsfield needs to build a new THS”) is faulty. No one knows if that is the case. Based on a falling school population and a crumbling local tax base, the premise looks faulty. Logic says that if the major premise in a deductive process is faulty, any conclusion will be false, even if subsequent reasoning is valid. That’s what we have here, a faulty major premise that has caused the false conclusions that the city “needs” this expensive school.

Back to Broward County, Fla. (from yesterday’s post). One way The Suits in Broward “sold” the overbuilding for schools was by using school population figures that soon were falsified by the county’s drop in population. In case you haven’t noticed it lately, but Pittsfield population is down from about 60,000 to 40,000. Where the city once had 12,000 kids in the public school system now has under 6,000. Nearly two-thirds of them are poor.

The Broward New Times: “For years, the [school] board kept the gravy train going, building and borrowing based on an outdated and useless survey. And the state stood by and allowed it to happen even as top school board officials clearly knew the new construction wasn’t warranted or justified.”

Interesting how the newspaper of that community went to bat for citizens. Where is The Boring Broadsheet in the THS matter? Where is local radio? Where is the mainstream media? Missing in Action.

And that’s where Pittsfield stands. The School Building Needs Commission has yet to make a convincing case. In a recent editorial, The Pittsfield Gazette said, “While the school needs building commission seems to have moved past its last wave of embarrassing outreach meetings, the well-intentioned board still struggles.”

Who blasted cares if the SBNC is “well-intentioned?” What bedraggled taxpayers deserve is intelligence and sharp stewardship. Pittsfield has been ruined by “well intentioned good guys.”

Citizens must force a vote.

Do you belielve in the democratic process? That’s what this is about. Do you wish to reclaim your government? If enough of you answer YES, there will be a vote. Soon, you will be hearing more about the process to put the question of new school construction to a binding referendum. It’s going to need your help. You may need to sacrifice just a little of your time and talent. If you show the usual disinterest and apathy, you will be signing your own civic death warrant.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are rapidly approaching a moment of truth for the city we all love. If you fail to support the initiative to force a vote on the building of a new school, you will have thrown away your best chance to reclaim YOUR government. If, though, you rally and out-maneuver The Suits, come November of this year, a new day might have dawned.

Do your civic duty. Be a Patriot. Like The World Champ New England Patriots, you can win the civic version of the Super Bowl.

Force the Vote.

——————————————————————————

 “And I’ll scrap anytime you say, Dim boy.” — Alex (Malcolm McDowell), from Stanley Kubrick‘s “A Clockword Orange,” (1971).

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spagirl
spagirl
9 years ago

A Vote to Bond a Project by the City Council cannot be challenged by the Voters according to some City Officials. City Council President Melissa Mazzeo said that city councilors were “elected to make that decision” I am looking forward to my vote when every single one of these Sheep look to Taxpayers to get re-elected.

dusty
dusty
Reply to  spagirl
9 years ago

the councilors represent the people. If the people tell the councilors they want something the councilors are supposed to listen. that is why we have their phone numbers and emails. Melissa needs to remember she is just a city councilor not some elected goddess who lords over the citizens. She needs to climb down off her self made pedestal.

Cherrie
Cherrie
Reply to  spagirl
9 years ago

That line that councilors were elected to make the decisions is pure BS. Mazzeo will be the first to go for this voter. Bianchi second. She is his handmaiden and they will pay at he ballot. They are incompetent full of themselves and not trustworthy.

Sparkie
Sparkie
Reply to  Cherrie
9 years ago

It is nice to know that someone who cannot complete a sentence is making my decisions for me…Thanks Mellissa. Also a big shout out goes to Lisa Tully for all of her thought full questions and input at the meting last night.

Pat
Pat
9 years ago

Jonathan Krol seems to be one of the worst councilors although they are all bad. He really seems to be trying to rush the project through probably because he is in the pocket of those who would benefit from the project and they do fear a vote.

Of course Massachusetts has a long history of ignoring petitions of the public and doing what the state or local government wants anyway. I’m thinking of several high profile issues several years ago in which petitions were totally and arrogantly ignored.

Pat
Pat
9 years ago

How do we get involved with forcing this issue on a ballot? There is no question that I will sign a petition, but what else is needed?

Ed McClelland
Ed McClelland
9 years ago

I realize this is old news to some, but i was told that city council president Mazzeo sends her children to private school and that state rep. TFP opts out of the Pittsfield schools and exercised school choice and sends her’s to Lenox. May be many reasons why, but since they are both outspoken advocates in favor of the new Taconic, are they planning on utilizing it ?

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Ed McClelland
9 years ago

Many of the rich send their children to private schools in this area because they believe that despite all the money put toward the schools in Pittsfield, their children will still get a superior education by going to a private school. Berkshire County people are most definitely education snobs.

nostrodumbass
nostrodumbass
9 years ago

The timing of this is quite interesting to say the least. This being an election year and all.

If the petition gets into the hands of the city council, they will be forced to bring about a vote on the project or find a way to circumvent the will of the people. Why do the people always have to fight those whom they put in office to represent them?

Even if the petition campaign is successful and it goes to a vote with a special election where the people vote the project down, I feel that they will forge ahead and build the new high school anyway. You only need to look back and see how the mall on North St. was handled. The people did vote on it and not just once but twice in favor of it. Whether or not the mall would have been successful is irrelevant; the fact is the people wanted it and did not get it. The then mayor – Charlie Smith – said no. Despite the overwelming vote and the will of the people; one man said no and stopped it dead in its tracks.

Charlie wanted it out on his buddy Kelly’s property out where WalMart now is. The mall built in Lanesboro instead….. well you know the rest of the story.

This sitting city council and this mayor will throw every single obstacle in the way of this vote; just watch and see. They will keep repeating “Its for the children” cloak defense.

Its been a done deal ever since its inception. The people will end up footing the bill with increased taxes and fees. This mayor and city council does not give a damn about the will of the people or the struggling tax paying citizens.

The petition should go forward none the less. A vote for the new high school should be cast; up or down. My only point is watch what happens even if the people vote it down should it get that far.

Still wondering
Still wondering
9 years ago

The elementary schools in Pittsfield are generally fine. The problem starts in middle school and gets steadily worse from there. The kids who want to learn and have a prosperous life are made unpopular by the welfare kids who are just marking time until they are 18.
You’d have to be nuts to let your kids stay in Pittsfield’s schools beyond the 5th grade.

Guess what
Guess what
Reply to  Still wondering
9 years ago

I disagree. My children attended the public schools, graduate, when on to college and are doing very well right here in Pittsfield. The education starts at home.

Scrumdiddlebug
Scrumdiddlebug
Reply to  Guess what
9 years ago

I hope the education at home didn’t start or end with spelling and verb tenses. As a teacher who used to work in the PPS, I agree with most assessments on here. The state of our high schools alone is disastrous and most teachers are afraid to even reprimand a student for fear of retaliation from the student or their parents. The administration does nothing to back them up either.

MrG1188
MrG1188
9 years ago

Has there really been no presentation of the renovate vs. Build scenarios compared? That should be a no brainer to clear that hurdle. The second point though, shouldn’t there be consideration of a regional Tech High School, with real Tech courses and trade courses offered….wasn’t that considered at one point? Or am I just remembering the discussion around what programs would be included in the “new” Taconic? Is that where they cut the engineering and stuff…and kept the cosmetology? And why is there nowhere that teaches a certification in Sales?!?

B. Clairmont
B. Clairmont
Reply to  MrG1188
9 years ago

MrG,

All of those things were discussed at length. The process has been very slow and that may be why people don’t remember.

I personally attended three meetings (not council or school meetings) where the public was invited to come and see the options and voice their opinions. Much to my dismay, only about 10 citizens showed up to each of those meetings.

The meetings were talked about at council meetings, school building needs meetings and school committee meetings, as well as published in the Eagle. Yet, only a hand full of citizens showed up.

Barry

Dammit
Dammit
Reply to  B. Clairmont
9 years ago

Yes sir,

10 people showed up out of city of 40,000 people.

Which shows that 99.9% of the people do not want the new high school.

Why don’t you grow a set and spearhead the election to let people vote on it?
Up or down — let the people decide.
Its the people’s money YOU are spending. Are you running for reelection? Denying the people a vote could knock you out. It should not be up to you to decide.

Let the people decide and we live with the outcome of the vote.

MrG1188
MrG1188
Reply to  B. Clairmont
9 years ago

Thanks Barry. I don’t live in Pittsfield, but have served on School Committee for years and was always deeply frustrated by lack of attendance…followed by accusations of secret closed-door deals. People need to be involved in their government, or they will not get what they want.

joetaxpayer
joetaxpayer
Reply to  B. Clairmont
9 years ago

Barry I do remember the #s. One thing that stuck out with the partial renovation part new was way more sq footage than just new. Thought they did this to drive up cost.

joetaxpayer
joetaxpayer
9 years ago

The one thing that boggles my mind is why the state would give less of a reinbursement for renovating. With the religion that is Global warming, you would thing they would like to keep the carbon footprint down. Renovating is cheaper so why not at least match or go above the percentage the state gives for new. I challenge are Berk. State reps and Senator Downing to address this on Beacon hill.

MrG1188
MrG1188
9 years ago

Joe…what are the odds of that? They won’t even challenge the ridiculous, extortionist rate hikes from the electric utility, over which Downing actually holds some sway, saying docilely, “there’s nothing we can do.” Smitty at least has howled some…but he seems to be alone and Downing has done zero.

Dave
Dave
9 years ago

I think the first person that would be behind a vote regarding the spending of multi-millions of taxpayer dollars would be former Ward 6 Councillor Dan Bianchi. I can’t believe the BB didn’t reference the forced vote on the Civic Authority in it’s editorial today. During all his prior campaigns the BB couldn’t help themselves from bringing it up every chance they got. The city’s estimated cost as of now is between 40-45 million for the new Taconic, what was the city’s estimated cost of the new stadium?
And yes, I know the vote was on the Civic Authority, not a stadium(and I voted no), but the point being Mayor Bianchi was instrumental in securing a vote for WE THE PEOPLE. So maybe your efforts are misdirected, instead of pressuring the city council go to the defender of WE THE PEOPLE Mayor Dan Bianchi.

Butch Cassidy
Butch Cassidy
9 years ago

When you look at this article from the BB:

http://www.berkshireeagle.com/local/ci_27459832/pittsfield-councilors-residents-hear-detailed-taconic-update?source=rss

it ssems they are saying the old Taconic is falling apart; leaky roof, faulty heating heating system etc. Now here is food for thought; why would the city of Pittsfield let this high school fall into such a delapitated condition? 70% of every dollar you pay goes for the education of the yoots.

What are they spending all this exhorberant money on? Certainly not maintenance. Moldly basement at city hall. Hey lets lease new space. Let’s prop up the old Berkshire Antheneum with wood beams because its falling down. Its a damn good thing it miraculously healed itself suddenly after they built a new one.

“Same old story, same old song and dance”
– Aerosmith

joetaxpayer
joetaxpayer
Reply to  Butch Cassidy
9 years ago

Sounds like they need a new roof, and new boiler. Believe Sheffield is doing that work on there high school that was built in 90’s..Think they could even cut in a few windows for the children too.

Inside Crowells Brain
Inside Crowells Brain
9 years ago

I love the Planet!