Article

CITY AUDIT, LACKING AS IT IS, REVEALS DIRE STATE OF PITTSFIELD’s FINANCES

0 0 votes
Article Rating

BY DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI NEWS AND COMMENTARY

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, THURSDAY, MARCH 24, 2016 — Get the panic button handy.

As of the fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2015, “The City’s liabilities exceeded its assets … by $44,990,750. This compares to the previous year[,] when liabilities exceeded assets by $38,586,112.” For those keeping score at home, the additional $6,404,638 of debt amounted to a 17% hit.

THE PLANET doesn’t have to get all Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, or Charles Trczinka on you to point out the obvious: When liabilities exceed assets, you are in debt. As the most recent audit revealed, Pittsfield has run up massive overruns.

Before we get to other interesting nuggets that you won’t likely hear about otherwise, we need to say something about the nature of the audit itself.

Mathematical Review Alone Doesn’t Add Up

The city of Pittsfield just received and released yet another “Independent Auditor’s Report” from Scanlon & Associates.

Stop us if you’ve heard this one before.

Scanlon has been doing the city’s reports for years. It writes, “Our responsibility is to express opinions on [the city’s] financial statements based on our audit.” True enough. Scanlon performs a mathematical review of the city’s books. It will take expenditures and receipts and check if the numbers add up. It does not perform a management audit or a forensic audit.

Here’s the difference:

Let’s say the Maintenance Department shows an expenditure of $10,000 for plastic flowers. The auditors come in, see the expense, check the paperwork, and pronounce that it all adds up. The city receives an A+. You can see the problem. What about the question of whether or not it was wise for Maintenance to buy $10,000 of plastic flowers. A management audit asks that question. It will investigate and conclude that while the numbers adds up, the expense makes no sense. The city receives an F.

Locked and Loaded

THE PLANET shares this information so that you are armed. When the city sends out its press release about how great they did in the Scanlon audit, and when the Mainstream Media (MM) lops it all up and runs the glowing story under headlines of praise, you will know what the real deal. You will know that simple math has nothing to do with the question of  if the city is spending (and and receiving) money wisely. What? You say the MM actually reported some of the truth? Well, yes it did. From one of colleagues at The Boring Broadsheet, our coverage of this last week forced The BB‘s hand.

Other Findings in the Audit

Here are some other “highlights” of the Scanlon audit:

  • Pittsfield had a total net pension liability of $120,222,899. This obligation is but a fraction of the OPEB liabilities. Time to get home rule and restructure all pension and OPEB deals. Same with current contracts with the teacher’s union.
  • Total liabilities increased by 12%, or $33,248,098, to $315,939,095. Let that figure sink in, especially when you realize this doesn’t include what will be a minimum of $121 million in borrowing for a new school (likely to hit $200 million once overruns, work orders, and other charges are added. As if you need reminding, your “representatives” denied you a vote on this unneeded expense).
  • Scanlon attributed the alarming increase in debt “to increases in warrants,” bond anticipation notes, and “in the other post employment benefit (OPEB) liability.”
  • Pittsfield had $5,045,476 in certified free cash — the amount the city overtaxed citizens. Instead of returning the funds to taxpayers, the city keeps the money in reserve as a slush fund.
  • Revenues from “operating grants and contributions” were down $9,493,964.
  • Other key indicators of revenue drops document the continued deterioration of the Pittsfield economy — Motor vehicle taxes, other excise taxes, hotel room occupancy tax, and meals tax income were all down.
  • More ominously, the penalty revenue Pittsfield collects from taxpayers who fall behind in payments were up more than 100% — from $487,620 in FY’14 to FY’15’s $979,522. This provides indisputable confirmation of something you first read about (and only read about) on THE PLANET. People are being taxed out of house and home.

What Mayor Linda Tyer, the city council, and the Pittsfield School Committee (PSC) learn from the documented shocking state of Pittsfield economy shall be revealed in the first budget presentations of the mayor and the PSC.

——————————————————————————————————-

“So runs my dreams, but what am I? / An infant crying in the night; / An infant crying for the light, / And with no language but a cry.”Alfred Lord Tennyson, Stanza 54, lines 17-20, In Memoriam, (1850).

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

The views expressed in the comment section or opinions published within the text other than those of PLANET VALENTI are not those of PLANET VALENTI or endorsed in any way by PLANET VALENTI; this website reserves the right to remove any comment which violates its Rules of Conduct, and it is not liable for the consequences of any posted comment as provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and PLANET VALENTI’s terms of service.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
36 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dilly Dally
Dilly Dally
8 years ago

Houston, we have a problem.

Already Tyred
Already Tyred
8 years ago
johnny dingo
johnny dingo
8 years ago

So I assume the mayor, with Kerwood at her side, is going to address the public to explain what all this really means to the citizens and taxpayers?

What percentage of this debacle occurred during the Ruberto and Bianchi administrations?

If we continue to try to tax our way to heaven how many more people who actually have jobs will move out of the city and how many more section 8 people who do not pay taxes will move in?

Pat
Pat
8 years ago

Pittsfield residents are literally being taxed out of house and home. Between the unneeded Taconic High School project and the increasing demands for more money from the school system each year, Pittsfield is in deep trouble financially. The meals tax was only supposed to be temporary as so many councilors promised, but we all knew that we would never get rid of it once it was imposed.

The truth is that ever since the progressives took over in this area, it has been nothing but a downward slide for the economy. All they know how to do is tax. They rob people of a voice in their own government and tax them into oblivion. How many reality challenged people in this city will ignore these hard facts and say that all of us on Planet Valenti are terrible people because we tell the truth? All because they can’t handle the truth.

Jonathan Melle
Jonathan Melle
8 years ago

Wow! That is powerful stuff. Pittsfield politics’ finances is in big trouble. The lovely Linda Tyer inherited a big mess from her predecessors Jimmy Ruberto and Dan Bianchi. Pittsfield politics makes things worse by raising taxes and bending over for the vested interests that keep the Good Old Boys in office. Pittsfield politics municipal debts will never be paid off in our lifetimes. Pittsfield politics is on the road to bankruptcy!

William
William
Reply to  Jonathan Melle
8 years ago

Powerful stuff. Jonathan is right about that. I think one point we shouldnt forget is forget about her predecessors. What is the lovely Linda going to do about it.

DV laysit out nicely at the end. Her budget will tell all. She needs to freeze school spending to last year and subtract at least $1..

Jonathan Melle
Jonathan Melle
Reply to  William
8 years ago

Pittsfield politics is always very predictable.
Every year, Pittsfield politics raises municipal taxes by about 5%.
The lovely Linda Tyer will just add about 5% to last year’s municipal budget.
They should call it “the about 5% budget increase rule”.

Roger
Roger
8 years ago

What did they do in the Weimar republic?
They just kept printing money while it worked until it became totally worthless.

What will Pittsfield do?
They will just keep raising taxes and fees until it gets beyond people’s ability to pay.

Progress Liberal Democrats know only one way – tax and spend.
The whole idea of cutting things they don’t need and living within their means is beyond their mental capacity. Building a new high school they don’t need and cannot afford is a perfect example of this. The will of the people is not even considered. This project will be the straw that broke the camel’s back.

Free Bird
Free Bird
8 years ago
Roger
Roger
8 years ago

Here is how the progressive liberal mind thinks:

Proposition 2 1/2 override.
(Proposition 2.5 was put in place to help protect the people from overtaxation).

Increase “free cash” slush fund.
(In other words, overtax the people and keep the money).

Over assess the value of the people’s property.
(In other words, do not assess the people’s property based on fair market value but assess them more so the city can take more money from them).

Instead of proper stewardship of the people’s money……. tax & spend. Its all they know.
A $200 million dollar new high school…… build it, then figure out how to overtax the people and squeeze them to pay for it.

acheshirecat
acheshirecat
Reply to  Roger
8 years ago

Borrow, Spend, Tax, repeat, Borrow, Spend, Tax, repeat……

Wolfman
Wolfman
Reply to  Roger
8 years ago

Should a proposition 2 1/2 override come to a vote, will it pass ? It appears that those who,regardless of a referendum, continue eating at the public trough, contol the electorate.
A saving posssibility however is the inordinate number of municioal employees that don’t reside (although they probably vote, here) in Pittsfield.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  Wolfman
8 years ago

Will there even be a vote or as with the new high school will they just pass it on their own? I have zero trust in our government, local and federal.

painter
painter
8 years ago

L T & B C are going to be no different than anyone ells that has held that office they will tax us seniors right out of our homes. and they wont realize what they have done until they get much older. better build some more places to house us. can you guess why we have anger.

Magic
Magic
Reply to  painter
8 years ago

Painter – maybe we can live in Taconic High School after the new one is built cause neither will be able to afford our homes. $150 abatement for the elderly doesn’t cut it when taxes go up and up and up
just saying

Shakes His Head
Shakes His Head
8 years ago

Was the doubling of penalty revenue the result of Pittsfield finally selling off tax foreclosed properties?

johnny dingo
johnny dingo
Reply to  Shakes His Head
8 years ago

Did they foreclose on that large property out on the way to shaker village? The one that now seems to be doing a logging business? Is this business paying taxes? Probably not. special treatment guy. So many special treatment folk and the elderly trying to hang on to their homes must pay the differential. So sad. So immoral.

Gene
Gene
Reply to  johnny dingo
8 years ago

The doubling of penalties came from households and families who largely have paid their taxes but due to the local economy (no jobs) fell behind or cannot pay and were foreclosed.

That business you mention about by Shaker. great question. What is the status? Anyone know?

Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection
8 years ago

Dan

While I totally understand that there is almost always overruns in construction you keep presenting misleading facts. The way that I was understanding the new school project CANNOT exceed the $121 million. Under no circumstances will city residents be paying $200 million for a new school. The very most it will cost is $121 million. That is part of the contract so I’m assuming any overruns will be eaten by the contractors. That’s how this was explained to me many times by more than one person familiar with the project.

Roger
Roger
Reply to  Hugh G Rection
8 years ago

Nope.
Act-Shellee, there is no such thing as a guaranteed cost of $121 million.

Ooooops PCB removal, didn’t see that coming
Ooooops we didn’t include the cost of demolition and disposal of old high school.
Ooooops, we planned on a flat roof but the sloped costs more.
Ooooops you want the parking lot paved?
Ooooops we got bad estimates from contractors.
Ooooops you want walls and doors?
Ooooops, you want windows?
Ooooops, turns out the state is broke and cannot pay its share.
On and on and on…………….

It will exceed $200 million dollars. Guaranteed!
Watch and learn
Dan is correct here.

Paul
Paul
Reply to  Hugh G Rection
8 years ago

Hugh, it never works that way. Unless the contractor himself does something wrong to cause an overrun the taxpayer is on the hook.

James the Great
James the Great
Reply to  Hugh G Rection
8 years ago

And you believe that?
Oh I have a river I want to sell you. It’s called the Housatonic. Pretty as a peach and clean as a whistle.

Shakes His Head
Shakes His Head
Reply to  James the Great
8 years ago

And new HS will at least get state funds as opposed to local funds paying 100% of duct tape and bubble gum.

mi
mi
8 years ago

If you believe no cost over runs then you have a Huge G Rection.

CosbiesLadies
CosbiesLadies
8 years ago

What is wrong with people today, there are cops coming and going all day long.

Sonny
Sonny
8 years ago

I thought it strange Tuesday night not one of the gutless councilors wanted to talk about the elephant in the room. Wouldn’t a simple question to Scanlon of given this dire financial
news of the cities financial status do you feel this is the appropriate time to undertake a 120+ million school building project? Even though Mr Gaetani is viewed as a loose cannon
he is spot on relating to the financial problems this city is in and the probable future taxpayer abuse. Liberal politics can only survive in decent financial times. Voters really need to start paying attention.

Already Tyred
Already Tyred
Reply to  Sonny
8 years ago

I certainly wouldn’t call him a loose cannon Sonny. He’s been talking about what that auditor fellow spoke about at the council meeting for months, but all he ever got were blank looks from the council. It might be in the city’s best interest to listen to him about improvements to the water plants and waste water plant before the city gets fleeced again just like were being fleeced on the new THS.

James the Great
James the Great
Reply to  Already Tyred
8 years ago

And DV has been talking about it for years before that.

Nota
Nota
8 years ago

Taxpayers need to start paying attention.

Donna M
Donna M
8 years ago

I ran into Mr. Gaetani today in Big Y. He told me that he had Lew Markham for a quest on his show. I can’t wait to see it tomorrow

Shakes His Head
Shakes His Head
Reply to  Donna M
8 years ago

Was he there circulating a petition to bring THS? He better get on that or he will be beat AF when they reject it for lack of supporting signatories.

Discreet Cat
Discreet Cat
8 years ago

The Great One’ is the best thing to happen to Pittsfield since percolated coffee.

Charles Trzcinka
Charles Trzcinka
8 years ago

Hey thanks for the plug, but Adam Smith and Milton Friedman are ah, out of my class.

Still if liabilities exceed assets for a company it is bankrupt.The shareholders would file for bankruptcy to get some of the creditors paid and maybe to keep the operation going. For a city, well, it depends on whether the taxes can cover the debt payments. If they can, the city keeps going. If not, then usually the state takes over (a la, Detroit). What helps in this situation is to list all the sources of funds and then list all the uses. If uses are bigger the city is kaput ( a technical term…).

Discreet Cat
Discreet Cat
8 years ago

Pitts should go in the tank now, why prolong the agony?

joetaxpayer
joetaxpayer
8 years ago

Pittsfield is like John Kaisic, mathematically the numbers don’t work, but continue as usual. We won’t get any tax relief until we go into receivership. Until then spend like a sailor on leave.

M Raty
M Raty
8 years ago

Sadly, I would have to agree with Mr. Valenti’s OP, as well as Mr. Trzcinka’s and Mr./Ms. Free Bird’s comments.

Harrisburg, PA, a city of comparable size, sought bankruptcy protection from the mounting debt of bonds. Detroit, though much larger in population, actually went into bankruptcy due to mounting pension and OPEB obligations.

Harrisburg was able to dismiss the threat, thanks to selling the bonded incinerators and other city assets, as well as some concessions from union employees. Detroit still struggles through because it is “too big to fail.” Lamentably, Pittsfield is neither.

As a twenty-plus year transplant, I had hope to continue living in the area. Observing the current and future cost vs. benefit of living in this stumbling city, I’m thinking long and hard.