Article

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT DROPS BELOW 6,000, YET DEPARTMENT WANTS TO “STUDY WHY” … FEWER PUPILS + NEW $130MM SCHOOL DOESN’T ADD UP

0 0 votes
Article Rating

By DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI News and Commentary

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, MONDAY, NOV. 24, 2014) — It’s interesting that since THE PLANET has been pounding on the millions of dollars Pittsfield loses each year to school choice, The Boring Broadsheet has taken up the cause. We are glad for it. Our love of communication, our love of newspapers, has driven us to prod The BB into better, more relevant, harder hitting coverage.

For a while, readers and viewers have noted how The BB has played “me, too” with THE PLANET. We break a story, and the attention it gets forces The BB to follow suit. Many examples can be cited, including the Monterosso-Berkshire Works coverage, the Frieri firing, and 100gate.

The student population drop story that ran as the lead story on page one Saturday (11/22) is a case in point. That The Eagle has now added its voice to our aria (grande voce) provides greater coverage of the song. You first read about the public school population dipping below 6,000 in Pittsfield on this website.

Really, Jake? You Have to ‘Study’ It? 

THE PLANET has to chuckle at the bewilderment (even stupefication) expressed by Pittsfield school supt. Jason “Jake” (JIV) McCandless  in reporter Jim Therrien’s story. A few points are worth nothing about McCandless’ reaction:

(1) The superintendent’s defensive attitude in noting that all country districts save one are losing students. This is true, but THE PLANET reminds JIV that he is the superintendent not of county schools but of Pittsfield schools. An aside would have us note that by far the best candidate for superintendent of schools to come along in years (maybe decades) couldn’t even get the time of day from the school committee. We speak of Christine Canning.

(2) JIV said the enrollment drop in Pittsfield will cause the department to look at why it’s happening. Duh-ah. Pittsfield have been losing students (and millions of dollars) to other districts for all the time of JIV’s tenure and long before, and JIV only now concludes it must be studied? This, my friends, is politics. It certainly isn’t enlightened school administration.

(3) JIV said “something structurally  … will have to change,” a sly plug for the unneeded but lucrative $130+ THS building project, perhaps? He noted that a committee has been formed to study the problem “because we have to try to understand why this is happening and how we can get better.” Earth to JIV: While THE PLANET wholeheartedly agrees with your statement, we can tell you right now — If your serious about finding the causes, the last thing you want to have is an in-house committee looking at it. Politics, politics, and more politics. For that matter, THE PLANET fails to see how, in light of a plummeting of enrollment of students, building a new high school that the city doesn’t need and cannot afford will help.

(4) In Therrien’s story, JIV says parents “should not panic.”Folks, when the GM tells the fans through the press “don’t panic,” it’s time to, well, panic.

School Choice Reporting Reveals More Dishonesty

School choice has been kicking butt and taking names in the city for a number of years now, taking hundreds of students and millions of dollars with it. This clearly show that Pittsfield schools, despite receiving 70% of a massive nine-figure municipal budget, cannot compete.

This leads to an aspect of school choice that almost everyone, including The Eagle, has overlooked. Credit where credit is due: THE PLANET only found out about this during a lengthy interview with Supercitizen and former school committeeman Terry Kinnas.

Pittsfield taxpayers lost $2.1 million last year to school choice. Bad enough, but you will hear administrators boast of the “progress” represented by that number. They will tell you that the number of parents pulling their kids out of Pittsfield schools fell from 398 to 373. What they don’t tell you is that they do not count losses to the BART Charter School in Adams.

When you include the losses to BART, you have to add another $2.2 million lost to Pittsfield taxpayers, bringing the grand total to $4.2+ million. Thus, be extremely careful before you accept any numbers or “data” from McCandless, the administration, or the school committee. The info is likely to be the product of corrupt, crafty, cunning, and crooked processes.

Garbage in, garbage out; Politics, Politics … All is Politics.

Pittsfield loses students because of competition, plain and simple. You won’t fix that with $130 million woorth of new bricks and mortar.

You want to add and not lose students, Pittsfield? Then get serious about the classroom and not about salaries, pay hikes, and adding positions to an already bloated bureaucracy. Require school uniforms in the middle and high schools. Enforce — instead of ignore, which Pittsfield School Department is now doing — the district’s policies on bullying and drug use.  In other words, get real.

Until that happens, JIV, it’s all politics, politics, and more politics.

——————————————————————————————

“Anger, she smiles towering in shiny metallic purple armor. Queen jealousy envy waits behind her, her fiery green gown states at the grassy ground.” — Jimi Hendrix, “Bold As Love,” from the album Axis: Bold as Love, (1967).

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ed Check
Ed Check
10 years ago

In addition to uniforms, a total ban on cell phones, iPads, and music devices during the school days. From someone who knows!

Shakes His Head
Shakes His Head
Reply to  Ed Check
10 years ago

That will make students want to stay in Pittsfield. ad keep them off everyone that comments on this page’s lawn.

Scott
Scott
10 years ago

Let me a guess the “study” wil tell us we need a new school. Remember thier solution a few years back was to purchase billboard advertisment (I can’t afford that for my business) for parents to look at as we drive our kids to school out of town? I feel like it shouldn’t be hard for jake to understand why people choose to bring thier kids out of town for an education considering he was a super in south county. It seems it would be pretty obvious to me so who’s really pulling strings? Is JIV just a puppet here in Pittsfield?

Charles Kronick Berkshire
Charles Kronick Berkshire
Reply to  Scott
10 years ago

I met with and spoke with Jake McCandles on several occasions and found him to be responsive and intelligent. He is an important part of the community’s interest in educating and steering the city’s children the right direction.

Scott
Scott
Reply to  Charles Kronick Berkshire
10 years ago

He is Charles and I agree but as long as he talks and no one is listening…

Kevin
Kevin
Reply to  Scott
10 years ago

JIV is another school supt. “caretaker” along the lines of Darlington, Eberwein mold. Their first order is “Don’t rock the boat”…

nostrodumbass
nostrodumbass
10 years ago

The school committee, the Mayor and city council have already decided on building a new high school. Its a done deal already. The people who will be paying for it are totally left out of the process. Doing a study is just smoke and mirrors and will ADD money to this unnecessary project.

How about instead of paying for a study, have a special binding election so the people paying for the project can have a say in weather or not to proceed? Not in Pittsfield! “They” decide for you and then make you pay by raising your taxes and holding your property hostage.

When Pittsfield does finally go bankrupt, anyone who says “didn’t see that coming” is a total fool.

Spider
Spider
10 years ago

Refresh my memory, please. Did the citizens of Pittsfield ever have a chance to vote on the new Taconic?

Notice how South County rejected the plans for renovations to their high school?

spagirl
spagirl
Reply to  Spider
10 years ago

It never was put on a ballot vote for citizens for a newTaconic High School.

Spider
Spider
10 years ago

Another question! When all these kids were being pulled out of Pittsfield schools, were “exit” interviews ever done?

If they were, why didn’t the school dept. act upon the results at that time? But now they are going to investigate? Give me a break!

Too little…..too late!

Wilson
Wilson
10 years ago

Don’t the towns that gain school choice students complain that it costs them more than they receive from the state? It’s clear that in a teachers cartel dominated city like Pittsfield there is zero incentive to retain kids, and even an impulse to push more out, since the goal is maximum profit and minimum work per teacher. McCandless is doing his part with ludicrous justifications for increasing property tax funding per student the more enrollment declines.

Carolyn Barry
Carolyn Barry
Reply to  Wilson
10 years ago

It costs $15,000 a year to educate a student in Lenox (last years figure) and we receive $5000. Last year we educated 220 and now it’s up to 240 ish. We are stuck with these students til they graduate or opt out. You don’t need an expensive study to know why. Just read facebook and blogs. The city of Pittsfield should have the new school put to a vote. I don’t mind paying taxes in Lenox to educate Lenox students but subsidizing Pittsfield students is Bull$%^&!

Scott
Scott
Reply to  Carolyn Barry
10 years ago

The fact that it cost $15,000 a year to educate one child is bs.

Charles Kronick Berkshire
Charles Kronick Berkshire
10 years ago

The driving assumption is that school choice is based on educational objectives alone. They certainly count, but you also have to account for those who have logistical needs addressed by choice, such as split families, location, work routes.

Scott
Scott
Reply to  Charles Kronick Berkshire
10 years ago

Sure charles and gangs, drugs and violence. Not to say other districts don’t have thier own problems to overcome but at least kids there don’t have to choose between the bloods and the crips. Some problems with PPS are social and out of the hands of administrators who can only do so much. Giving them more money and newer buildings will do nothing to change how parents raise thier children an what frame of mind some of these little monsters are taking to the playground.

dusty
dusty
Reply to  Charles Kronick Berkshire
10 years ago

I honestly do not see the will to improve the system. I would guess that most of the administrative personnel connected to the Pittsfield school system are where they are due to political connections rather than their desire to help children learn. They are looking out for number one.

The whole system should be turned over to charter schools totally devoid of politics. And there should be a separate school for those “students” who are only there because they have to be. Give the ones who want to excel a positive environment.

What are we paying something like $12,000 per year per child? Maybe more. And how many of them are just not going to make any effort? What a waste. The whole system is set up to fail and that school committee, like several before it, is a joke, a laughing stock.

billy
billy
Reply to  dusty
10 years ago

I agree dusty

Shakes His Head
Shakes His Head
10 years ago

While there are curious quick fixes suggested here,and steeped in conjecture and old-timey malarkey, the endemic problem is that the Berkshires have ZERO competitive advantages over other regions for young families, the national trends are smaller households because kids are freaking expensive, and there are not substantial employment opportunities in this region. You may be able to tourniquet the limb of schools-of-choice, but the system is still going to wither from 1,000 cuts.

Deb S
Deb S
10 years ago

Just a thought, is there a way of drawing up a petition forcing the city of Pittsfield to put the proposed new Taconic High School on the ballot for a vote?

all tapped out
all tapped out
Reply to  Deb S
10 years ago

Why its not already in the city charter than such a large outlay of capital expense is mind boggling.

The new city charter should never have been passed and was designed or written for the benefit of the people.

The city charter should have put to a vote.
The new high school should be put to a vote.
The recall of the mayor should proceed.

Building a new high school and putting the expense on the backs of taxpayers without their approval is simply taxation without representation. Seems to me there should be grounds for a lawsuit or injuction to stop this.

Scott
Scott
Reply to  all tapped out
10 years ago

The city charter was put out to vote. I voted against it.

Spider
Spider
Reply to  Deb S
10 years ago

B. Clairmont…..Deb S’s suggestion is a good one! Any chance of getting it on the ballet?

B. Clairmont
B. Clairmont
Reply to  Spider
10 years ago

Spider,

If there was a municipal election before the decision needs to be made there is a way to do it (not 100% sure of the details off the top of my head).

I’m not sure there is a way of calling for a special election just for this question; I doubt there is a way to accomplish that.

The vote from the Council is supposed to take place around the March time frame; as I understand it.

The next municipal election isn’t until November 2015.

Barry

Spider
Spider
Reply to  B. Clairmont
10 years ago

Thank you Barry for your response. You seem to be the one person on the CC we can go to.

What exactly will the CC be voting on in March?

I was strongly supportive of a new school, but lately I am having doubts. I was disappointed that some technical programs were eliminated, yet cosmetology was kept.

B. Clairmont
B. Clairmont
Reply to  Spider
10 years ago

The city can’t borrow money without city council approval. That is what the council has to vote on. It will be a while because the design and more accurate cost estimates need to be developed.

Barry

Lenny
Lenny
Reply to  danvalenti
10 years ago

There are many options… before or after the vote.

http://www.ecode360.com/27967518?highlight=petitions,petition,citizen#27967518

I like option 9.2 the best, below:

SECTION 9-2 CITIZEN REFERENDUM PROCEDURES.
(a)
Petition, Effect on Final Vote – If, within 21 days following the date on which the city council or the school committee has voted finally to approve any measure, a petition signed by a number of voters equal to at least 15% of the total number of voters as of the date of the most recent regular city election and addressed to the city council or to the school committee, protesting against the measure or any part of it is filed with the secretary of the school committee or city clerk, the effective date of that measure shall be temporarily suspended. The school committee or the city council shall immediately reconsider its vote on the measure or part of it and, if the measure is not rescinded, the city council shall provide for the submission of the question for a determination by the voters either at a special election, which it may call at its convenience, within such time as may be requested by the school committee or at the next regular city election; provided, however, that pending this submission and determination, the effect of the measure shall continue to be suspended.

Ron Kitterman
Ron Kitterman
10 years ago

http://www.everyschoolthebook.com/

Check this book out the author’s theory is to invest in people and get away from the progressive concept of the collective and move more toward the individual.

Zen
Zen
10 years ago

The fact that the Pitts school department has to even do a study in the first place is one of the problems. Everyone else knows why students are leaving and they don’t?
In my dealings with the Pitts school dept. I have found them disorganized, unresponsive, and even arrogant and snotty.

Knows the Truth
Knows the Truth
10 years ago

If Great Barrington can do it, Pittsfield can.

dusty
dusty
Reply to  Knows the Truth
10 years ago

Two totally different cultures. I disagree.

I thought I read that they already had the thing designed and would not be surprised if the contractors have been hired. For all we know here in Pittsfield they may have already begun construction and just never told us where they are building it. It was months before anybody knew Bianchi was moving city hall up the road. Nobody is going to stop this gravy train steam roller without a tea party rebellion.

Zen
Zen
Reply to  dusty
10 years ago

Dusty, you are correct. The new school is a done deal.

Nota
Nota
10 years ago

Question for Barry. If a overwhelming number of voter tell you no new school, are you going to vote accordingly? Another question, seeing as the Building Needs Commision doesn’t have a vote, why not let the taxpayer vote on this? Councilors are beholden to the voters.

Bea Breef
Bea Breef
10 years ago

Shouldn’t City Councilors know by now if this will be put on the ballot?

Bea Breef
Bea Breef
10 years ago

Looks like the Grand Jury is about to announce the decision on the Michael Brown shooting and are hopeful there will be peace when it is announced.

Kathy Lloyd
Kathy Lloyd
10 years ago

The two middle schools are level 2 the two high schools are level 3 (4 is the worst, 1 is the best.) I am willing to do work to make the PPS system better but until then I sent my daughter to a nearby town’s level 1 school. The elementary school in my neighborhood is also a level 1, but if I wait until middle school to choice her in there’s a big chance that there won’t be choice spots available. No one has ever contacted me on why I chose to take advantage of the choice system.

Here’s the state profile for the PPS system. Even my level one elementary is on the low end scale and the nearby town is one of the best in the state. My daughter can’t wait for the PPS to get it together, she needs a good education now.

http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/profiles/general.aspx?topNavId=1&orgcode=02360000&orgtypecode=5&

PopKornSutton
PopKornSutton
10 years ago

Watching these Jets, they suck

Smoky Furguson
Smoky Furguson
10 years ago

I don’t know about the a Jets but all hell is breaking loose in Missouri.

Scott
Scott
Reply to  Smoky Furguson
10 years ago

I think it’s absurd what the media and department of justice did with this case. They withheld the video of this kid strong arm robbing a store and the fact that he attacked the police officer when confronted. That’s why he was shot not because he was black. I too was upset when I first heard about it now I’m angry because I was mislead and lied to. Let the idiots burn the damn city to the ground they’re just a bunch of ignorant aholes who are destroying thier communities slowly anyways. The police and good people should hit them with everything they have and take thier city back.

Charles Kronick Berkshire
Charles Kronick Berkshire
Reply to  Scott
10 years ago

Officer Wilson should hit a collective group of media and reporters with defamation lawsuits for portraying an admittedly ‘one sided narrative’. Such a lawsuit worked for Mr. Jewell.

Bill
Bill
Reply to  Charles Kronick Berkshire
10 years ago

Charles KB, On that same line have you seen the Nancy Grace Show and her take on the issue? Wow…

Berkshirite
Berkshirite
10 years ago

I think the City needs to vote if we want to exclude the new debt from the Prop. 2 1/2 limits. I believe we did that with the last round of renovations to Egremont, Williams, Herberg, etc.