BRATTON’S COMMAND IGNORED BY NYPD’s (UN)FINEST…COPS DISS DEPT. ‘TRADITION, HONOR, & DECENY’
By DAN VALENTI
PLANET VALENTI News and Commentary
(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, MONDAY JAN. 5, 2015) — On Saturday, prior to the Sunday wake of Officer Wenjian Liu, one of the two NYC police officers ambushed and murdered by a “make ‘em pay” gunman, Police Chief William Bratton had his command staff read a statement prior to roll call at all shifts in all precincts.
Bratton asked for the police not to turn the wake into a political event. “A hero’s funeral is about grieving, not grievance,” the chief said in his statement. “I remind you that when you don the uniform of this department, you are bound by the tradition, honor, and decency that goes with it.”
Unfortunately, thousands of officers on Sunday turned their backs on Mayor Bill de Blasio as they have before whenever the mayor has delivered remarks about the two murders. Notably, the officers “backed” the mayor at the funeral of Officer Rafael Ramos two weeks ago. They did it again yesterday.
Union Leaders Agitate Raw Emotions to a Froth
Police union leaders have whipped up the troops’ emotions against the mayor for what they perceive to be his actions in creating an anti-police atmosphere in the city. Officers feel de Blasio especially contributed to an anti-cop environment with his actions and statements following the death of an unarmed black man at the hands of a white officer. The officer had used an illegal chokehold to subdue the man.
This is one of those events, like so many when politics intersect with the raw emotions of life and death, where both sides have credible positions. Rule of law, however, must prevail — especially among the law enforcers. Bratton is correct. Wakes and funerals are not political rallies. The “backing” of the mayor may be justified on a personal level, but it is the wrong tactic to use at a wake or funeral. Officers must respect the office of the mayor above abusing the mayor himself. More importantly, they must respect their dead comrades and their grieving families. The protests only feed the illusory point that the man is more important than the office, the opposite of what they intend. If they had thought it through a bit more, the officers would have heeded their chief’s advice.
Bratton Never Forgot His Roots
THE PLANET had the chance to interview Bratton in 1994. He had been named Boston Police Commissioner the previous year. The tape of that interview is long gone, but a couple things stand out. First, we remember how much he talked about his roots, growing up in Dorchester. He said that guided him in his policing philosophy.
Bratton said that all crime, from petty theft to murder 1, had to be treated swiftly and seriously. He said he regarded the vast majority of citizens as good, law abiding, and wanting only to be left alone from the sort of disruption that crime produces. In doing so, the police officer was the advocate and protector of the good citizen. That struck THE PLANET as wise.
The second thing we remember is how much he preached the importance of having “good cops” on the force. He acknowledged there would always be bad apples but his goal as chief would be to root them out and to establish an atmosphere where wrongdoing would not be tolerated — and reported if it occurred.
Some readers may recall “the Serpico days” of the NYC police force, when investigations and public hearings revealed massive, system-wide corruption. Forty years later, while not lily-white, the NYPD has a reputation for integrity, decency, and fairness. It was that reputation that Bratton called upon in asking that his troops not upstage Liu’s wake with politics.
De Blasio Must Bear Responsibility as Well
Of course, de Blasio isn’t just another mayor. No mayor of New York City can be “just another mayor.” He has in his short time inflamed his relations with police. For example, de Blasio has publicly allied himself with Al Sharpton, who has demonized the NYPD for years. When Sharpton turned 60 in October, de Blasio attended his birthday party. He described Sharpton as a new Martin Luther King, calling him the top civil rights personality in America and “a blessing for this city.”
——– 000 ——–
(A related story on Sharpton from the New York Post:
How Sharpton gets paid to not cry ‘racism’ at corporations
——– ooo ——–
De Blasio’s also retained Rachel Noerdlinger as his wife’s chief of staff at a yearly salary of $170,000, conveniently ignoring the arrests of Noerdlinger’s live-in boyfriend for anti-police activity. Only when Noerdlinger’s 17-year-old son was arrested for tresspassing at a drug location in the Bronx did Noerdlinger take an “indefinite leave of absence” (source Reuters).
Two Tenets, Two Acting Chiefs
THE PLANET would recommend Bratton’s two tenets to acting Police Chief Mike Wynn.
- Remember your roots. This keeps you always humble and citizen-minded, first and foremost.
- Prosecute crime, not just convenient crime. THE PLANET here thinks, for example, of well-known drug markets such as The Common and many West Side locations, where buying and selling take place routinely and brazenly in the open. Also, ask any high schooler if they see drug action on school grounds. The answer is yes. Ask them if administrators and teachers know about it. The answer is yes. Ask them if kids are afraid they will be arrested. The answer is no.
Mayor Dan Bianchi has foolishly continued his predecessor’s policy of keeping the most important public safety position in the city as “acting.” This cynical move puts politics ahead of public safety. Having “acting” as the predicate of office keeps the “Sword of Damacles” hanging over Wynn’s head. This in turn produces tentativeness and “politics” in an office where there should not be any.
It’s clear Bianchi doesn’t intend change this. Therefore, it will be up to the next mayor — assuming Bianchi doesn’t run again or if he does run will be defeated — to get rid of the “acting” status in this key office.
——————————————————————————————————-
“Hey everybody! Let’s have fun. You only live but once, and when you’re dead your done, so mama let the good times roll.” — Ray Charles, “Let the good Times Roll.”
“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”
LOVE TO ALL.
—————————————————————————————
Quote
“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”
LOVE TO ALL.
Mr. Valenti,
Why do you presume that NYPD union leaders are not speaking for the rank-and-file?
Further, who the hell are you to say that the officer acted illegally when a grand jury faced with the task of weighing far more evidence than you present here decided not to indict?
Let us not pull any punches with regard to Mayor Bill de Blasio’s very public mishandling of recent events in NYC.
The fellow is plainly inept and should resign post haste for the good of the office.
Who the hell am I, GMH? The author and publisher of this blog. Now THAT’s who I am? Your fundamentalist mentality has induced delusions, I’m afraid. Where do you see that I said the officer acted illegally. I simply stated a fact that the grand jury also acknowledged: the hold he used was illegal. The grand jury found, however, the action not actionable. Stick with the facts and react to what I write, not what you think wished I had written merely to fuel your partisan gripes.
Heller never lets obvious facts get the in way of his imperious jeremaids.
Here, the medical examiner ruled Garner’s death a homicide. The officer used a chokehold banned by the NYPD. But, the DA did not seek an indictment for reckless endangerment, but for more serious charges. So, the grand jury did not have the option to indict him foe the charge that best fit the facts of the case.
Of course, Heller cannot be bothered to actually read any of this. He just comes at everyone with his facile, results oriented conclusions.
Heller, how’d that photo contest work out for you? Still banned from Topix I gather. One can only hope that Dan does the same.
I am usually in sync with you, but not this time.
I believe the officers turning their backs on DeBlasio is quite appropriate. H has continually demonized the NYPD since before he was elected.
And his association with Al Sharpton does not warm peoples hearts.
Bratton had better defend the mayor, if he wants to keep his job.
In my humble opinion, it’s just that simple.
As the Roman Empire fell, the police looted people’s homes and person. Police brutality was rampant during the fall of the Roman Empire.
Does history repeat itself?
Not if we hold tight to the second amendment.
Scott, the solution to violence is not yet more violence. Why on earth do you feel the need to protect yourself from the marauding hordes that always fail to materialize? Life is not an episode of the Walking Dead. The government is not coming to take your guns away. The vast majority of police officers are good people trying to do a difficult job. Frankly, it’s weird that you surround yourself with instruments of death.
It’s like an insurance policy. You have it and hope you never use it.
The officer had used an illegal chokehold to subdue the man.
It is appropriate for the NYPD to reject the Mayor’s behavior, and the premise for you article, cited above, is false. The man refused to comply with an arrest. Refusing arrest means force must be used to bring you in. The hold was brief and was not a chokehold which is direct application of force to the trachae to control the victim’s ability to breath. Further, Mr. Garner was heard saying 11 times that he ‘can’t breathe’ which of course means that he was breathing, albeit with difficulty.
On account of his complaint, ambulance was summoned and he received treatment but died one hour later. The only thing you can accuse the NYPD of is acting on DeBlasio’s policy of enforcing a crackdown on sellijng bootleg cigarettes.
Is there any bandwagon not fit for you to jump on?
The last line is a cheap shot but then you are good at that.
I appreciate your criticism.
not to mention extremely poor grammar…
Aw shucks. Ain’t got the time to temper a sentence like I did in the old days.
The “choke” hold in question is not illegal but not authorized for use by the NYPD so the officer who applied it did not break a law.
Distinction without a difference since it’s also not illegal for police to tear out your heart and eat it
it’s also not illegal for police to tear out your heart and eat it
That didn’t happen either.
Were DeBlasio to have refrained from attending but sent a statement of goodwill, that act would have been concialiatory and respectful of the murdered police officers. It was his poor judgement to seek legitimacy by imposing his controversial self on those two funerals in particular, and the Garner death prior. (Note that Garner perished in July; no statement from DeBlasio until after his death became a ’cause’ only recently.
Dan,
I think its great that you don’t formulate your opinions based on political party lines but rather look at the facts and come to completely logical conclusions.
You are not afraid to point out wrongdoings from either political party.
GMHeller is hell bent on Republican agenda right or wrong in a Rush Limbaugh-esk unstable mentality.
Charles in Kronickally bent on Democrat extremeism and defends the Obama agenda to an equally but opposite unstable mentalitu.
A guy selling loosies to make a few dollars to support his family gets a chokehold that results in his death yet Al Sharpton who owes millions of dollars in taxes gets a pass. No chokehold there.
Right is right and wrong is wrong. Heller and Charles both have agendas and use your blog to further it.
There are good cops and bad cops.
There are good politicians and bad politicians.
There are good teachers and bad teachers.
We must remain vigilant!
Nicely written piece Dan. The corruption in the Pittsfield Police Department needs to be addressed. There is a demoted Pittsfield Police Detective patrolling the streets of Pittsfield in a police car who has charges against him for having sex in the back seat of a police cruiser with a victim of domestic violence. This abhorrent behavior, against a women needs to be addressed and not protected. Nero fiddled while Rome burned.
There are bad people in any organization of people whether we are talking teachers or policemen or any other group of people. That doesn’t mean we should disrespect all police or all teachers. I think the police have lost respect for DeBlasio because he was trying to portray all policemen as being racist and that is simply not true. Not all policemen are potentially racist and I can understand why they would feel that DeBlasio as their leader is trying to stir people up who are already stirred up over some incidents that have recently happened in the country. The police need someone as their leader who they can respect. If they feel he is putting their lives in danger in a job that is already very dangerous, they have a right to their feelings against him.
Al being compared to MLK is hysterical thanks for the laugh! New York like Ma is short on good political leadership.
‘Drew Stephens’ says “The government is not coming to take your guns away.”
Is that why there are so many legislative efforts across the nation (usually sponsored by the sleaziest of Liberal Democrat politicians) to curtail legal ownership of firearms?
Thanks, but I’d rather place my trust in the accuracy of news reports coming from the National Rifle Association.
(How did Berkshire County become a haven for so many Lefty cranks who would upend Constitutional protections in the name of ‘security’?)
SEE:
https://www.nraila.org/
I think GM he realizes how silly he sounded. We were talking about Rome and soldiers killing innocent people while they stood by helplessly not ambushing good police officers while they sit in thier car on duty. Instruments of death or life giving instruments I guess it’s all about perception.
The judges around this area are a huge problem, time after time they let violent offenders off with a slap on the wrist.
http://nypost.com/2015/01/05/bratton-friends-firm-gets-no-bid-deal-from-police/
Bratton friend’s firm to get no-bid deal from NYPD
Bratton has, over the years become 95% politician and 5% cop
and de Blasio is 100 % foolish
I guess Bratton didn’t forget his roots…