By DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI NEWS AND COMMENTARY

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, THURSDAY, AUG. 20, 2015) — Today THE PLANET retreats from the vermin-infested swamps of Pittsfield politics to the fresher air of sports. We present two items of interest.

ONE.

Have the Sox Found Their First Baseman?

TRAVIS SHAW

SHAW NOT RAW: Travis Shaw went 4-for-4 last night and is now batting .371 (23-for-62) with 2 2B, 5 HR, 10 RBI, and 4 BB in 22 career major league games…He has 7 multi-hit games in his 14 starts, and is batting .393 (22-for-56) as a starter, including 12-for-24 (.500) in his last 5 games.

·         Last night marked Shaw’s 2nd career 4-hit game (also 8/1 vs. TB…He is the first Red Sox player in the last 100 years to record multiple 4-hit efforts within his first 22 career major league games…He also became the first Red Sox with as many as 5, 3+ hit efforts within his first 22 ML games since Tom Oliver (6 in 1930).

·         Shaw recorded his 5th career homer on Monday night’s 2-for-4 effort…The only other left-handed Red Sox batters in the last 100 years with at least 5 HR within their first 21 career games are Sam Horn (7 in 1987) and Fred Lynn (5 in 1974-75).

————————————————————————————

TWO.

Deflate-gate judge hammers NFL’s case against Tom Brady

BY DAN WETZEL

YAHOO! SPORTS

SPECIAL TO THE PLANET — GUEST COLUMN

NEW YORK – Daniel Nash stood behind a courtroom lectern on the 17th floor of a federal court house here and tried to argue the NFL‘s case in suspending [New England Patriots quarterback] Tom Brady for four games in the deflate-gate saga.

Yet as the attorney made his presentation, he kept getting interrupted by Judge Richard M. Berman, who repeatedly engaged in direct counterarguments against Nash, sometimes even warning that legal precedent suggested the NFL could lose its case.

It happened over and over during Nash’s 63 minutes in front of the judge and with each Berman question or counterpoint, none of them positive for the NFL, Nash began taking a small, but telling, step back from the lectern, like a boxer retreating in the face of an incoming haymaker.

NFL’s Cross-Examination Double Cross

One example among many?

TOM BRADY

“There has to be some basic process of fairness that needs to be followed,” Berman argued to Nash after the NFL explained why it failed to allow Brady to question certain witnesses, notably general counsel Jeff Pash, who also co-wrote the disputed Ted Wells report about deflated footballs.

When Nash tried to argue that Pash wasn’t that involved and was more of an editor, Berman, like this was a cross-examination, pointed to an NFL press release that referred to Pash as “co-lead.” Nash, stepped back from that lectern, again tried to minimize it as just a press release.

“Well,” Berman said, “it’s not my press release. You all wrote it.”This is how it went, over and over. For the NFL … ugly. For the NFLPA, well, its 10-person legal team nearly skipped out of court after making an impassioned multi-point claim against the decision by commissioner Roger Goodell to uphold Brady’s discipline.

Kessler and the NFLPA argued that the league never provided notice to Brady that “general knowledge” of an infraction could lead to a suspension, that it didn’t allow a fair arbitration system, that Goodell knew he was compromised as an arbiter because he had previously praised the findings of Wells’ report, that the commissioner improperly increased the findings against Brady from “generally aware” to a full participant in a “scheme” based on no authority and no additional information, that the science of Wells’ report was junk, that the NFL didn’t provide attorney notes to the NFLPA in violation of federal standards and … so on and so on.

‘One Mississipi … Two Mississippi …’

Kessler, as is his way, was often flamboyant and laced his presentation with comic ridiculousness. He noted, for instance, that the footballs were, on average, just 1-2 percentage points underinflated and yet the NFL deemed it a grand conspiracy despite not being able to accurately measure the inflation levels. He likened it to getting pulled over for being 1 mile per hour above the speed limit and asking the police officer how he measured the speed.

“I counted, ‘One Mississippi, two Mississippi, three Mississippi, and I can tell you were 1 mile over,'” Kessler said, role-playing a cop.

Then there was this one from Kessler: “No one in the NFL knew anything about Ideal Gas Law, which is surprising because I think I studied that in ninth-grade science class.”

Even Berman laughed at that.

Berman didn’t just nod when Kessler argued that it says nowhere in NFL policy that a player can be suspended – or punished at all – for being “generally aware” of the conduct of others. He even added his own points, returning to the critical sentence of Wells’ report: “it is more probable than not that Tom Brady was at least generally aware of the inappropriate activities of [Patriots employees Jim] McNally and [John] Jastremski involving the release of air from Patriots game balls.”

Missing Date a ‘Conspicuous Absence’

Why, Berman kept asking, didn’t Wells include a reference to the AFC championship game or even the date of it, Jan. 18, 2015?

“To me it is a conspicuous absence from Mr. Wells’ finding,” Berman said, noting that game and that game alone is what is in question here, not text messages referring to past games. “Why wouldn’t you – he’s a smart lawyer – say on January 18, 2015?”

Berman also focused on how the NFL came up with the four-game standard, drilling Nash over and over about where this number came from, how much of it was about non-cooperation and how much for the footballs. Kessler argued that the crime was similar to stick ’em on a receiver’s hands or any other act like that, which under NFL policy is subject to a four-figure fine for the first offense, not a suspension.

Nash said Goodell decided to liken it to performance-enhancing drugs, which Berman couldn’t fathom.

“How is it equal to steroid use?” the judge asked with a tone of disbelief. “How did he pick steroid use?”

“I think the judgment goes to the integrity of the game,” Nash defended.

“Everything goes to the integrity of the game,” Berman said.

As for Brady not being allowed to question Pash about his role in Wells’ report, Berman blasted Goodell’s reasoning that it wasn’t allowed because the testimony would be “cumulative.”

“How would you know?” Berman asked if Pash didn’t testify. When Nash downplayed Pash’s contributions, Berman had none of it.

“Who else but Mr. Pash had the opportunity to edit the Wells report before it became public?” Berman asked. “Anybody?”

Judge Goes After NFL Mouthpiece

On every one of Kessler’s points, Berman seemed to take a sympathetic stance and in turn was adversarial to the NFL. What that means in the end isn’t determined, but consider toward the end, after Berman went after Nash for the suggestion that you could infer Brady was cheating because he stated that his preferred inflation level was 12.5 pounds per square inch, the legal limit. How, Berman wondered, could wanting the legal limit be a sign of illegal behavior?

Kessler obviously agreed and since he was pressed for time tried to paraphrase Brady’s testimony on the subject. Berman stopped him, said he was allowed extra minutes and then requested that Kessler read Brady’s exact words into the record. Kessler eagerly complied, reading in open court and for the court reporter a long session of Brady’s testimony that can only be considered pro-NFLPA.

——– 000 ——–

In the NFL offices, the mood was noticeably deflated. Meanwhile, Brady took part in the Patriots’ joint practice with the New Orleans Saints, throwing nothing but perfect spirals. The happy ending has already occurred. The Patriots broke the Colts in the AFC title game, 45-7, then went on to beat the Seattle Seahawks in the Super Bowl. It was the team’s fourth Super Bowl title since 2002. That is more championships than any team has won in that time in any of the major professional sports. Brady was named MVP of the game for the third time.

—————————————————————————————-

“She that’s a maid now and laughs at my departure / Shall not be a maid long unless things can be cut shorter.” — William Shakespeare, King Lear, closing lines of Act I, Scene V, (1603).

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

The views expressed in any comment section are not those of PLANET VALENTI or endorsed in any way by PLANET VALENTI; this website reserves the right to remove any comment which violates its Rules of Conduct, and it is not liable for the consequences of any posted comment as provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and PLANET VALENTI’s terms of service.