FOUR CONSECUTIVE YEARS OF SHANNON GRANTS NOTHING TO BOAST ABOUT FOR PITTSFIELD
BY DAN VALENTI
PLANET VALENTI NEWS AND COMMENTARY
First of Two Parts
(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, TUESDAY, FEB. 23, 2016) — Has anyone asked tough questions about the now-rote assignation of grant money by the state to Pittsfield?
Mayor Sara Hathaway was the first to openly admit the city’s unhealthy dependence on state welfare for its survival. In 2002, in the first year of her one and only term, Hathaway called the city a “junkie” for state dollars. Boston’s role in keeping the city afloat had reached a majority position, but why, especially when it’s well known that on Beacon Hill, “western Massachusetts” is anything east of Worcester’s western city limits. Why would Boston shower grant money on Pittsfield, a city that has only become 14 more years down and out since Hathaway’s pronouncement?
The Dark Side of ‘Free’ Money
That’s the dark side of the so called “free” money. Every grant has a set of footnotes, provisos, and small print. These arrangements, tiny in writing but gigantic in effect, saddle Pittsfield with the social detriments that can be seen daily on its streets, especially North Street and the West Side. You know what THE PLANET’s talking about: the influx of drug addicts, drunks, mentally ill, scammers, criminals, Sec. 8s, and others who have, largely by their poor choices that are nonetheless exercises of free will, have made themselves into what the do-gooders call “victims.” Actually, they are human waste. They consume vast amounts of services but contribute little or nothing to city coffers.
Why do you think the city has an wildly disproportionate number of group homes, “affordable” housing, social programs, and infrastructure to handle the “armies of the road?” One of the biggest reasons is state and federal grant money.
Grant money isn’t “free money” the state produces from surplus. Rather, it’s money that comes from your taxes, money that has contributed mightily to the state’s near-$1 billion deficit. Tell that to the politicians, state reps, and city officials. Each time the city received a grant, they preen in the gullible mainstream media about how great this is. Actually, the vast majority of grant announcements testify to the city’s failure to stand on its own two feet, healthy and able to move forward without the braces and crutches of grant dollars. Whose buried in grant’s tomb? Answer: Pittsfield, Mass.
Shannon Grants? Wide Right
Case in point is Pittsfield’s reception of yet another Shannon Grant. For four years in a row, the city has received this money. Four Shannon grants in four years? That’s like the Buffalo Bills going to four straight Super Bowls and losing each time. Wide right. Ask yourself: If this grant is the godsend that officials claim, why is Pittsfield fours years worse off with respect to youth crime, gangs, and criminality?
Earlier this month, Gov. Charlie Baker announced Pittsfield’s $95,000 award, part of the $6.5 million statewide total. Baker said the city earned the award for its “demonstrated commitment and creativity in combating the gang violence that threatens the safety and well-being of [its] residents.”
Right. In other words, the words were written by a junior staffer in the press office. The governor spoke of fighting youth violence with “a multidimensional approach that employs a full range of diverse and effective techniques …” Take a walk on North Street beginning at Columbus and Maplewood avenues. Start on the east side of the street. Continue north until the A-Mart Plaza. Take note of the critters you come across. At A-Mart, cross the street and proceed south to Linden Street. Take a right on Linden, and walk west as far as the Christian Center, then, if you dare, take a left of right and wander the side streets — Bradford, Dewey, Francis. If you make it out alive, ask yourselves if four years of Shannon grants have made a positive difference or if the money has made things worse.
‘Essential?’ Yes, But That’s the Problem
Mayor Linda Tyer and Police Chief Mike Wynn said the right things, calling the grant “essential to the city’s work.” That’s true, in the same way that heroin is “essential to a junkie’s work.”
Tyer said Pittsfield is “committed to working with our youth to give them the resources needed to manage challenging circumstances and position them for later success in life.” THE PLANET has no doubt that in the theoretical world, that’s what enabling grant money does. In the real world, however, the massive amounts of grant money from the state and feds only perpetuates the poverty and in effect rewards people for their poor choices.
Tomorrow: Part 2
——————————————————————————————-
“A team is where a boy can prove his courage on his own.” — Mickey Mantle
“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”
LOVE TO ALL.
The views expressed in the comment section or opinions published within the text other than those of PLANET VALENTI are not those of PLANET VALENTI or endorsed in any way by PLANET VALENTI; this website reserves the right to remove any comment which violates its Rules of Conduct, and it is not liable for the consequences of any posted comment as provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and PLANET VALENTI’s terms of service.
So you can say you learned it here first, Miss Hathaway was elected to fill the post of mayor when Gerry Doyle chose not to run and then defeated Jimmy Ruberto after he flew into town on a carpet, That’s two terms.
You are missing the larger point of his article by focusing on something he overlooked. You are not seeing the forest for the trees.
Thanks Pat, I never thought of that though perhaps your missing something yourself focusing on what I wrote.
Sara served one term as mayor. Just one 2-year term.
Incorrect. Sara defeated Jimmy in 2001, after Gerry’s term expired and he chose not to run. She served the term. Jim then got the rematch in 2003 and beat her. He then served for four terms.
My remarks are addressed to Mr. More.
His streak continues ! The G-Wiz submitted 6 petitions for consideration at tonight’s city council, and every one was disposed of by Mr. Marchetti under Rule 27.
Any update on his jury trial which was scheduled to begin yesterday ?
This happens routinely with councilor petitions too. It’s the normal process. It’s not a targeted insult on one person as you are suggesting here.
A good Mayor of Pittsfield would ask the following question:
“Does the average middle class family and small business want to move to Pittsfield?”
The answer depends on safe streets and good public schools.
In Pittsfield, the answer is that thousands of people and jobs have been lost in Pittsfield’s 4 decade long downward spiral.
About 70% of Pittsfield’s local residents live in poverty and depend on welfare assistance and social services programs. All K – 6 public school students now qualify for free school lunches.
Moreover, I believe that Pittsfield politics makes things worse! Pittsfield politics raises taxes by about 5% each and every year and invests in the corrupt vested interests instead of the people.
– Jonathan Melle
PUBLIC SAFETY ALERT!
Stay off of:
North st.
Tyler st.
Lincoln st.
First st.
Second st.
Linden st.
Dewey ave
Cherry st.
Burbank st.
Kent ave
Madison ave
And Seymour st.
And you might survive.
The City of Pittsfield (Mayor Tyer) should consult w/former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani, on how to combat crime. With those grants, the officers who sign up for them, should have their nightly numbers posted: traffic stops made, citizen contacts, warrants checked/arrested, number of people arrested, drugs and evidence seized. Do this for six months and watch the crime rate drop. Hell, watch the welfare rats move out of Pittsfield. The time has passed to clean up Pittsfield. Let’s start now. No more giving this OT money to cops who are going to disappear for 8 hours and collect an OT check. Let see some results. Team up with the state police, FBI, DEA, if need be, but let’s make Pittsfield unwelcome to those looking to exploit it. If Mayor Giuliani can do it in the biggest city in America, we sure as hell can do it in Pittsfield.
Gulliani was horrible with crime under the broken window policies. Racial problems with a side of civil rights violations.
Excellent commentary, Dan! You are so right!
I cringe when I read of our city getting state money because I know the negative requirements that go with it (sec. 8 for one).
Looking forward to part 2.
Mayor Giuliani did not clean up NYC in a vacuum, nor is it totally safe. What he did was concentrate resources on high value areas (read places where tourists or the mega rich gather) to clean out the scum.
Now that is a good thing – but the consequences to Pittsfield and nearly every other City within about 4 hours of NYC is plainly evident. The bad apples just moved. They have no ties to jobs or family, so they move – and then, like ants, establish new colonies of scum.
The Gateway Cities of Mass all have this in common, as do places like Bennington VT, Rutland VT, the Capital District of NY, many cities in NJ< PA< Maryland and western NY. These people have destroyed any place they arrived in.
Go to Court on a Monday and the folks you see all lived somewhere else 5 years ago and 5 years before that and 5 years before that. they use and abuse the system and move on when they foul their own nest.
Pittsfield's problem is regional and we need to combat it as such. the first thing we all need to do is to rise up and close down all the shelters, clinics and places of recovery – and move these folks along, like lemmings off the cliff.
my friend Smitty proposes a recovery high school. I imagine the problem hits closer to home than he admits in public. I think we should replace narcan with bullets and just kill off the generation of users and dealers – they have added nothing to society and more money spent on their recovery is money pissed away.
Southeast, as cruel as it may seem to some, the last two paragraphs of your contribution may be the only realistic way to deal with the problem. Would there be collateral damage? Of course, there always is. But when the dust settled life would be better for all.
Billions upon billions of dollars have been spent on the drug war. Hundreds of thousands of lives have been already lost. The results are not unlike the aftermath of war. A harsh, perhaps very harsh, approach is needed or we can use the same talking points ten years from now.
Well said Southeast. Also close down the new jail that attracts the scum so they can be near their looser husbands and boyfriends. When the scum gets out they settle in with their welfare queens.
So southeast, you are saying that we don’t have our own born/grown scam in Berkshire County? If we didn’t have the demand these drug dealers would not be moving here so let’s not kid ourselves. Let’s blame everyone else.
of course we have our own Guess. Some of them the offspring of the nice guys from the Bronx who descended on this lovely place, some from Brooklyn. And some from families who have been here so long their families have naming rights to certain cells at the County Jail.
But if you look at who has arrived since crack arrived in the 1980’s – a lot of those from the New York area and others the have attracted have no good family ties to the community and many are anchored by their connection to the Jail.
You don’t usually wind up in Jail if you go to school, get a job, pay your bills and live a nice quiet life do you? And while we may have 1 in 60 or 70 (1.5 – 2% of the total) bad apples among our own, the newcomers were virtually a 1 to 1 (85-100%) ratio of arrivals as dirt bags.
My personal favorite, is when the school dept. gets one of there frivolous grants. They tell us how it won’t cost the taxpayers anything. Then after a year or two the grant runs out and then becomes a line item in the school budget, BS. ( bait & switch).
Hey Joe, (a favorite song of mine!) a school committee worth its salt should always consider the sustainability of a program after the grant expires. Should it be built into the budget? Can it pay for itself? Sounds like the Pittsfield Committee just takes the money and says thank you.
Key ingredient…. “worth it’s salt” not happening here
Dan, I’m hoping tomorrow’s installment will bring out the actual fruits of the deals with the devil; proof of some of the trade offs made, with details. This topic has been bandied about here for some time now, and I have no doubt it’s true; that there are always strings attached to the state’s money. I’d just like to know, in concrete terms, what is traded for what. Thanks for pushing on this.
Pittsfield received over 7. 5 million dollars from Lottery return,where does that money go?
Awesome question. Who would have that answer? Who amoungst our elected leaders will come forward to inform the public so that they do not become suspicious? Surely Mr Kerwood knows. Surely the mayor knows. Surely Mr Marchetti knows.
And a non political non vague answer would be appreciated.
I will admit that I don’t watch the council like I did a year a go but when these so called grants or free money came up there was no discussion no questions asked they would just say move for approval and it would get approved. Not quite the open Government I would like to see.
Earlier this month, the school committee met to consider adding yet one more administrative position to the payroll in the form of a grant writer. They were bemoaning the loss of close to a million dollars in grants over last year.
http://www.iberkshires.com/story/51181/Pittsfield-School-Officials-Weigh-Value-of-Hiring-Grant-Writer.html
The school committee did add this position. It also added a new administration position at Allendale School. Assistant dean of students.
The problem with grants is that, as DV says, they perpetuate rather than solve problems. So true…counterintuitive maybe but true. When the grant dollars go away taxpayers then pick up the slack. It’s an awful system.
Wow, excellent question Trumped Up! That’s a food amount of money. Anyone?
That’s what Trump does, he answers his own questions.
Tim, which one are you?
watch a rising star tonight as Mel Maz (lone wolf for the peeps) kicks butt for the taxpayer and takes names later.
Now that the Empty Suit is gone she for the peeps?
better late than never I guess
C O U N C I L G R A D E S : Rivers/ Ungradable
White/ Ungradable
Simonelli/ Ungradable
Krol/ Ungradable
Connell/ A
Mazzeo/ Ungradable
Tully/ A
Amuso/ F
Morandi/ Ungradable
Marchetti/ A
Caccamo/ Ungradable