Article

QUESTIONS MOUNT ABOUTS HINDS’ CLAIMS, AS DOES THE SILENCE OF HIS CAMPAIGN FROM HONEST INQUIRY

0 0 votes
Article Rating

BY DAN VALENTI

PLANET VALENTI NEWS AND COMMENTARY

(FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE, THE LABOR DAY WEEKEND EDITION, SEPT. 2-5) — On his website, Democrat state senate candidate Adam Hinds advertised Aug. 26-28 as the “Weekend of Action.” By the time the weekend was over and then some, his campaign had more “action” than it wanted. The campaign had been caught breaking the law twice, the candidate bailed out of two televised debates, froze in the flip-flop headlights on a key campaign issue, had his equivocating on key issues called to task, and had claims on his resume questioned.

Since then, it has sucked to be Adam Hinds. Where does THE PLANET begin? How about his resume?

Claims Without Evidence Are Suspect

 

ADAM HINDS (look closely in the background) (PHOTO: iBERKSHIRES)

Education — His website tells us that Hinds “studied at Wesleyan University before studying international law and negotiation at … Tufts University [THE PLANET‘s emphasis]” Elsewhere, he has said he “attended” these schools — but did he graduate? Did he earn degrees? Where’s the sheepskin? THE PLANET has seen no information substantiating that Hinds successfully completed the degree requirements of these schools. As of press time, The Committee to Elect Adam Hinds ignored our request for documentation. Is this what Adam Hinds is hiding?

Pittsfield Coalition Connection — Hinds claims to have “started” this anti-gang initiative. The PCC website, however, makes no mention of Adam Hinds, either as its founding father or as being involved in any key manner. Odd in the extreme. There’s no doubt Hinds cashed checks from the non-profit supported by taxpayers funds, but what else?

Northern Berkshire Community Coalition — Do you notice a pattern? Since moving to Pittsfield, Hinds has not held a private sector job. He has only held feathered offices with no accountability (has Pittsfield’s gang situation improved? How about Northern Berkshire’s  dreadful situation with respect to jobs, poverty, and drugs?) but lots of political connections. Is this all John Olver‘s doing? THE PLANET is certain it wasn’t Kofi Annan.

A Plethora of Political Suck-Up Positions

The “About Adam” section of his website had this vapid gem: “Adam understands what it takes to make the region thrive.” The paragraph explaining this topic sentence reads as follows: “He is working to keep young adults in the area through his work on the Steering Committee of the Berkshire Youth Leadership Program, a program of the Berkshire Chamber of Commerce, and as a Member of the Berkshire Compact for Education. He is committed to our high quality regional institutions and is a Corporator of the Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts Foundation and a Member of the Access and Benefits Committee of Berkshire Health Systems, the region’s largest employer. On a state level, Adam is on the Board of Directors of the Robert F. Kennedy Children’s Action Corps, and he is a Truman National Security Fellow.” The common thread continues: Hinds gets himself appointed to countless organizations that exist mainly to provide networking for political cringers looking to advance. Trust us: You don’t meet too many Mary Jane and Joe Kapanskis in such hob-nobbing.

How does that mish-mash of non-sequiturs illustrate that “Adam understands what it takes to make the region thrive”? And what does such a vague claim actually mean? If he understands this, why isn’t he sharing the knowledge that has eluded the best minds for more than a generation.

Hinds claims working for the United Nations for 10 years “on issues at the heart of US national interest in the Middle East.” He has produced no specific evidence. He claims to have been “a team leader” of a UN negotiation between the Kurds and the government of Iraq. “Team leader?” That could be telling a couple interns when people needed coffee or fetched papers. Again, the claim is unsubstantiated. None of this means it didn’t happen, just that, when pressed for details, The Committee to Elect Adam Hinds clams up.

Let’s Have Another Cup of Kofi

KOFI ANNAN, not to be confused with Coffee Anon. (PHOTO: UN ARCHIVES)

Then there’s his twitchy penchant of invoking the name of Kofi Annan, former UN secretary general. Hinds claims he and Annan personally and together tried to broker a ceasefire in Syria, but where is the documentation?

Kofi Annan or “Coffee Anon.?” The “About Adam” part of his official website ends with this sentence: “He … has a strong appreciation for a good cup of coffee.” THE PLANET is guessing that “Coffee Anon.” (Coffee Anonymous) is the closet Hinds got to “highest-level” negotiations with Kofi Annan and other “world leaders.” And no, we don’t count selfies of the sort that groupies produce to show they once actually breathed the same air as Britney Spears. THE PLANET has asked the campaign but has received no reply. We will share the substantiation the moment we receive it from The Committee. Of course, when the phone doesn’t ring, we will know it’s “The Committee” not getting back to us.

ADAM HINDS, with his, uh, high-level negotiators (PHOTO: The Berkshire Edge)

That’s the other creepy thing about Hinds’ campaign. His handlers seem to be doing everything they can to keep him from any sort of public events where their boy can face tough questions or actually have to think on his feet. One of the key people on his campaign, deep off the record, told us about the “thick binder with a ton of tabs” that Hinds needs on hand so he can “memorize his talking points.” That person also told THE PLANET that his primary strategy includes, and we quote, “At no point should you engage in public questioning with Dan Valenti.” If that is not accurate, THE PLANET will be more than happy to relay that information.

Money, Money, Money … It’s a Rich Man’s World

We leave on this note. On Aug. 31, the candidates filed their campaign finance reports. Andrea Harrington, who has won THE PLANET’s endorsement for the Thursday, Sept. 8 primary, raised $20,850 during the reporting period ending the last day of August and spent $15,221.54, leaving her with $5,628,46. Hinds raised $74,916.91 and has spent $54,680.95, leaving him with $20,235.96. Two questions:

  1. Do you think his backers are trying to buy the election?
  2. Who are his backers?

The first question we can leave up to you to decide. As for question two, click on this tab: http://www.ocpf.us/Reports/DisplayReport?menuHidden=true&id=582486#schedule-c

You will find tabs for “Summary,” “Receipts,” Expenditures,” and “In-Kinds” (the value of donated goods and services). You will find a practical Who’s Who of  “The Usual Suspects”: His donors include the Maxymillians of construction fame, Mary K. O’Brien, John Olver, Richard Stanley, Joyce Bernstein, Mike Supranowicz, Chris Farrell, Brian and Tyler Fairbank, David Bassaillion (of Hotel on North fame), and Kathy Yon. You get the picture or “nuff ced.”

DONNA TODD RIVERS, left. The sign says it all. (PHOTO: iBERKSHIRES.COM)

A curiosity in the expenditures are payment of $1,000 (May 22); $1,000 (May 30); $1,000 (June 27), and $1,000 (July 19) to Ward 5 city councilor Donna Todd Rivers. Reason for the expense: “Campaign Consulting Services.” Right. On Aug. 21, Hinds paid Rivers $2,500 for “Field Director Staff Pay.” Right again. DTR also received “reimbursements” of $180.99. These “reimbursements” were not documented.

That’s nearly $6,700 for less than three months of service. This would be innocent enough except that, the last time we checked, we did not see DTR listed in the Hall of Fame of Political Consultants. DTR is a failed attorney, a failed small business owner, and a huckster-slash-entrepreneur for the way she can get women of a ceratin age and/or mindset to all drink wine and paint the same boring picture of happy flowers in a sparkly meadow.

Obviously, she has others areas of expertise along lines with which THE PLANET is not familiar nor do we wish to be. Moreover, we find it a bit unsettling that a city councilor should be in so deeply, financially, with a man looking to be the district’s senate rep. For a sitting politician to donate money is one thing. Receiving money is another. THE PLANET can’t call it a conflict of interest, exactly, but nonetheless, something doesn’t seem right.

With that, let us open The Comment Line, encouraging intelligence and dissuading ignorance.

Have a great weekend, everybody.

———————————————————————————————

“For a divided house is not a den of thieves. It is only a divided house.”Kahil Gibran, from The Prophet.

“OPEN THE WINDOW, AUNT MILLIE.”

LOVE TO ALL.

The views expressed in the comment section or opinions published within the text other than those of PLANET VALENTI are not those of PLANET VALENTI or endorsed in any way by PLANET VALENTI; this website reserves the right to remove any comment which violates its Rules of Conduct, and it is not liable for the consequences of any posted comment as provided in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and PLANET VALENTI’s terms of service.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
128 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
heh heh
heh heh
7 years ago

Actually, the PEDA site is ideal for medical marijuana crops. The soil has been prepped with high growth chemicals and the site will get full sunlight. Irrigation provided by Silver lake. The politicians could make this happen since they ultimately will own all the dispensaries. (true story)

Terms like economic engine, collaboration and sustainability could be legitimately used. And there is nothing more artsy fartsy than marijuana. If you want to draw people into the city get out in front of the east coast hemp cake and cookie trade. We could even harness some of these bitchy senior citizens to work off their tax liability at harvest time.

I am not even kidding about this one. I have got my people in design building a mockup of the whole facility including the crop land, bakery and production building. OMG I am getting tingly just thinking about the endless economic possibilities.

Looking for investors. Who is on board??

Rocky Creed
Rocky Creed
7 years ago

You have to give credit to the water wizard GC for at least trying to give the taxpayers a vote on the new THS project—like him or not

Discreet Cat
Discreet Cat
Reply to  Rocky Creed
7 years ago

I like him and respect him.

Pat
Pat
7 years ago

Walmart pays nearly $15.00 per hour and offers over 35 hours per week plus benefits. A Super Walmart will employ even more. What are people complaining about?

MrG1188
MrG1188
Reply to  Pat
7 years ago

Pat, are you sure of that? I’m not arguing with you, I just want to know how you know because my understanding that the incidence of people earning more than $10 per hour at WalMart was rare and that most were in facr under that.

Pat
Pat
Reply to  MrG1188
7 years ago

I am sure. Dan V. checked into it and posted it on one of his blogs and many Walmart employees both in Pittsfield and North Adams have said that they make nearly $15.00 per hour.

Idoubtit
Idoubtit
Reply to  Pat
7 years ago

I remain skeptical about that statistic for a few reasons. First, consider the source. It’s being touted by an organization whose sole goal is to convince Pittsfieldians that putting a Super WalMart in their city center is a good thing.

Second, even if accurate, the statistic may be incredibly misleading. It is framed as the average wage for “full time workers excluding new employees.” What constitutes a “new employee?” Also, what percent of employees are “full time,” or are offered “full time” positions? How many employees are scheduled for 33 hours (or less) per week so they can technically be classified as part time and thus be outside of this statistic? Finally, offering “full time” employees only 34 hours instead of 40 hours a week is itself a tactic to have a greater percentage of part time workers, which WalMart apparently pays less.

Third, I read an article recently where WalMart was touting that it was raising its Department Managers’ wages to $13/hr. It’s really hard for me to believe that a manager makes less than the average worker.

The bottom line is that: if you could find an economic study showing that WalMart (I) doesn’t result in a net-job loss for the community and (ii) doesn’t result in more money leaving the community than otherwise, I’d be shocked. I’m very skeptical that this statistic is anything more that a creative attempt to put lipstick on a pig. But I’m happy to be proven wrong.

Ed Shepardson
Ed Shepardson
Reply to  Pat
7 years ago

In April Walmart, the largest private employer in the U.S., announced that 1,030 workers in Massachusetts received pay raises as part of raises that went into effect this week across the country. The average full-time hourly wage for Walmart workers in the state is $13.88, according to the release. The starting rate is $10.00 per hour.

Shakes His Head
Shakes His Head
Reply to  MrG1188
7 years ago

Considering that’s minimum wage, Wally can’t pay under that.

Joe Blow
Joe Blow
Reply to  Pat
7 years ago

Bullshit!

southeast
southeast
Reply to  Joe Blow
7 years ago

well Joe, I guess you do not want to let your opinions be swayed by facts do you?

Wages and hours are reported by every employer to every State. Having been in business for myself, I have filled many reports out.

If WalMart was lying, you can bet that the Dept. of Labor in Mass and elsewhere would fact check and reveal the truth in a heartbeat.

The odd thing is, that Target, the favorite of the elite (because they sell their cheap Chinese crap in prettier colors) reports lower starting, average, and typical wages.

So much for the so called “progressive” values they hold.

Discreet Cat
Discreet Cat
7 years ago

Now I’m going to Church and ask the Planet for forgiveness. Lol

chuck garivaltis
chuck garivaltis
7 years ago

You know it, we’ve heard it many times. Who’s the fool when we get fooled once or twice? We’re going onto our second time for sure, maybe a third. Let’s look at our history.

A few years back Governor Mike Dukakis with support from Pittsfield Mayor Paul Brindle denied Lenox curb cuts on routes 7 & 20 forcing Pyramid & Co. to consider downtown Pittsfield for their mall.. It worked, but a handful of Pittsfield merchants prevailed on city officials to kill the project because it is not right for Pittsfield. Sound familiar? We are hearing it again. Denial this time may not just ruin us economically but may kill us. Walmart is proposing a $30 million plus project, not counting infrastructure and other Tyler upgrades and improvements and the naysayers are saying “no” because we can do better. Really! Watch out you economic genius’s, This project could wind up in Lanesboro. If anyone is paying attention the mall has been sold and it sounds to me like Walmart could be a target. The new folks are not going after Tiffany’s or Macy’s. Read about them.

‘s

southeast
southeast
Reply to  chuck garivaltis
7 years ago

It could and it will – except that it will be too close to the Supercenter in N Adams that draws from MY State and Southern VT.

The mall was a failure because it could not draw from south of Pittsfield – and anyone who moves into their vacant space might just well siphon enough business to make Lanseborough and unattractive site as well.

I’m not happy about it – but I will accept it at the PEDA site.

By the way, that curb cut denial was over 30 years ago….let go. Like the train station, which was in disrepair and unused when it was torn down – those times were different. the world has changed and there is no evidence that building the mall in Lenox would have made it successful. After all – look what happened to George’s shops on Rt 7 across the street when the outlet stores opened. In fact, the place is revitalized – but in part by getting rid of some of the retail.

The best place for a mall in Berkshire County would have been somewhere on Rt 102 or Rt 20 right off the Mass Pike in Lee. And the best place for a WalMart is actually where folks who use WalMart live, not making them drive 15 minutes further out.

acheshirecat
acheshirecat
Reply to  chuck garivaltis
7 years ago

They are going to spend $12 million to clean the property and fix the storm run-off problem. If Walmart does not build there guess who will be on the hook to pay $12 million for the clean-up before another business even considers that spot? G.E. Does not own the property anymore, its on us. $12 million is the number today. It will only go higher if not dealt with in the near future.

Miss Vito
Miss Vito
7 years ago

Start at the bottom, how much do greeters get, then cashiers,how about the mechanics that do auto services,are these wages averaged in? Who gets the kickback?

Really?
Really?
7 years ago

Really?

SE, I call things the way I see them. Sorry if my post offered you. There have been far worse posts on this blog. Aren’t politicians supposed to have thick skin.

Really?
Really?
Reply to  Really?
7 years ago

Really?

This was supposed to be posted in response to SE comment below.

southeast
southeast
Reply to  Really?
7 years ago

about their ideas, they need thick skin. About who they are or are not – issues which do not have anything to do with their ideas, no they need not have thick skin. We should know how to criticize without being hurtful.